Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Reintgen, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Austin, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Reintgen, D. S.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 1, Issue 6 487-494, Copyright © 1994 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Age as a prognostic factor in the malignant melanoma population

P. F. Austin, C. W. Cruse, G. Lyman, K. Schroer, F. Glass and D. S. Reintgen
Division of Surgical Oncology, University of South Florida Medical School, Tampa 33682-0179.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing faster than any other cancer, and the state of Florida has one of the highest incidence of melanoma in the United States. This increased incidence is thought to be due to the intense sunlight exposure and ultraviolet radiation exposure in the elderly population. With the increased emphasis on issues of aging, it is appropriate to study the role of age as a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma in the Florida population. METHODS: A retrospective, computer-aided search identified 442 consecutively registered patients with malignant melanoma at the Cutaneous Oncology Program. All patients had stage 1 or 2 disease (cutaneous disease only) at diagnosis. Prognostic variables analyzed included the most powerful factors for stage 1 and 2 melanoma, tumor thickness, ulceration, and Clark level of invasion. Other prognostic variables included in the analysis were the clinical variables of sex and primary site (axial vs. extremity). The population was divided into patients < or = 65 and > 65 years of age. RESULTS: Significant disease-free survival differences were encountered in the older population, with only 55% of the elderly population being disease free at 5 years compared with 65% for the younger population (p = 0.0073). However, a greater percentage of patients with melanoma who were > 65 years of age had ulcerated lesions (17.5% vs. 12.9%) and a greater percentage of thick lesions at diagnosis (67.2% vs. 62.7%). Both of these prognostic factors would bias the older population with a poorer survival. A stepwise regression analysis of the entire population was performed, treating age as a continuous variable. Surprisingly, increasing age along with tumor thickness were the only significant predictors for disease-free survival. After inclusion of these two prognostic variables, none of the other prognostic factors, including Clark level, ulceration, sex, and primary site, added to the prognostic model. CONCLUSIONS: From this analysis, it is apparent that geriatric patients with melanoma have a worse prognosis than a younger control population, even after the correction for the more commonly cited prognostic factors. This information should be used in mathematical modeling to identify high-risk populations who are candidates for perhaps more aggressive primary or adjuvant therapies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
J. R. Lange and C. M. Balch
Melanoma in Older Patients
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 399 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
K. B. Stitzenberg, N. E. Thomas, K. Dalton, S. E. Brier, D. W. Ollila, M. Berwick, D. Mattingly, and R. C. Millikan
Distance to Diagnosing Provider as a Measure of Access for Patients With Melanoma
Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2007; 143(8): 991 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
F. Tas, S. Kurul, H. Camlica, and E. Topuz
Malignant Melanoma in Turkey: A Single Institution's Experience on 475 Cases
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 36(12): 794 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Chao, R. C. G. Martin II, M. I. Ross, D. S. Reintgen, M. J. Edwards, R. D. Noyes, L. J. Hagendoorn, A. J. Stromberg, and K. M. McMasters
Correlation Between Prognostic Factors and Increasing Age in Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3): 259 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. K. Chang, I. A. Jacobs, V. M. Vizgirda, and G. I. Salti
Melanoma in the Elderly Patient
Arch Surg, October 1, 2003; 138(10): 1135 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. M. Balch, S.-J. Soong, J. E. Gershenwald, J. F. Thompson, D. S. Reintgen, N. Cascinelli, M. Urist, K. M. McMasters, M. I. Ross, J. M. Kirkwood, et al.
Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2001; 19(16): 3622 - 3634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
L. Wright and R. Bramwell
A qualitative study of older people's perceptions of skin cancer
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2001; 60(3): 256 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
D. J. Van Durme, J. M. Ferrante, N. Pal, D. Wathington, R. G. Roetzheim, and E. C. Gonzalez
Demographic Predictors of Melanoma Stage at Diagnosis
Arch Fam Med, July 1, 2000; 9(7): 606 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.