Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leitch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leitch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, R. F.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 1, Issue 6 516-520, Copyright © 1994 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

Breast cancer in a county hospital population: impact of breast screening on stage of presentation

A. M. Leitch and R. F. Garvey
Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

BACKGROUND: Indigent patients in a county hospital setting typically present with breast cancer at a later stage than do patients in the private sector. In the early 1980s, 50% of all breast cancers diagnosed in our county hospital were stages III and IV. This contrasted markedly with the findings of an American College of Surgeons study, which showed < 15% of breast cancers diagnosed as stages III and IV. METHODS: Recognizing this disparity, we instituted a breast screening project in the county teaching hospital targeted at women who routinely received medical care in the county hospital clinics. Between 1985 and 1992, 14,567 mammograms were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-nine breast biopsies were performed and 76 cancers were identified (26%). Ninety-five patients advised to have surgical consultation for biopsy declined further evaluation. The stage distribution of cancers diagnosed was as follows: stage 0, 20%; stage I, 43%; stage II, 28%; stage III, 8%; and stage IV, 1%. This compares favorably with National Cancer Data Base statistics for 1988. In contrast, symptomatic nonscreened patients diagnosed at the county hospital in 1992 presented at a significantly more advanced stage: stage 0, 1%; stage I, 14%; stage II, 45%; stage III, 26%; and stage IV, 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic screening has lowered the stage of cancers diagnosed in the screened indigent population. However, a significant percentage of patients are presenting to our hospital with stage III and IV disease. Problems identified in the screening project included noncompliance with recommendations for follow-up of abnormal studies and noncompliance with appointments. In order to broaden the impact of our breast screening project, we have instituted outreach programs with community-based clinics and the American Cancer Society.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Promot PractHome page
A. C. Gregg, M. DeHaven, J. Meires, A. Kane, and G. Gullison
Perspectives on Adherence to Recommended Health Behavior among Low-Income Patients
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2001; 2(2): 162 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.