Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Ann Surg Oncol Early Release 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.073 on November 10, 2003

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10:1152-1159 (2003)
© 2003 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krag, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Single, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krag, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Single, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathology
Right arrow Prognostic factors
Right arrow Surgery

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Breast Cancer Survival According to Number of Nodes Removed

David N. Krag, MD, FACS and Richard M. Single, PhD

From the College of Medicine (DNK) and Department of Medical Biostatistics (RMS), University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: David N. Krag, MD, FACS, S. D. Ireland Professor of Surgical Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Given Building, Room E309, Burlington, VT 05405; Fax: 802-656-5833; E-mail: david.krag{at}uvm.edu

Background: Results from randomized trials indicate a 5.4% survival advantage associated with axillary dissection. To gain insight on survival outcomes when less than an axillary dissection is performed, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine survival outcome for node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients when a variable number of nodes were excised.

Methods: The data analyzed in this paper are from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, from which 72,102 patients were selected whose breast cancer had been diagnosed in 1988 or later and who were aged 40–79 years at diagnosis, had a single primary lesion, and had 0 to 3 positive lymph nodes. Cases were separated into age groups (40 to 49 and 50 to 79 years), and node-negative cases were separated from those with one to three positive nodes.

Results: This analysis indicates that even when all regional lymph nodes are pathologically negative, the number of nodes removed is associated with survival. In the group of breast cancer patients who had one to three pathologically positive nodes, as with the node-negative group, the higher the number of nodes removed, the greater the survival. The hazard rate for death in the node-negative group was roughly 5% less for each additional five nodes removed. For the node-positive group, the hazard rate for death was between 8% and 9% less for each additional five nodes removed.

Conclusions: This retrospective study supports the notion that removal of regional nodes, even when such nodes are interpreted as pathologically negative, is important for the long-term survival of breast cancer patients.

Key Words: Axilla • Breast cancer • Lymph nodes • Survival




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. Verleye, I. Vergote, N. Reed, and P. B. Ottevanger
Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG)
Ann. Onc., June 25, 2009; (2009) mdp196v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
T. S. Dabakuyo, F. Bonnetain, P. Roignot, M.-L. Poillot, G. Chaplain, T. Altwegg, G. Hedelin, and P. Arveux
Population-based study of breast cancer survival in Cote d'Or (France): prognostic factors and relative survival
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2008; 19(2): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I Blancas, J. Garcia-Puche, B Bermejo, E. Hanrahan, C Monteagudo, A Martinez-Agullo, R Rouzier, B. Hennessy, V Valero, and A Lluch
Low number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative breast cancer patients is an adverse prognostic factor
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1644 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
P. F. Escobar, R. J. Patrick, L. A. Rybicki, D. Hicks, D. E. Weng, and J. P. Crowe
Prognostic Significance of Residual Breast Disease and Axillary Node Involvement for Patients Who Had Primary Induction Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 783 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
B. O. Anderson
How Many Nodes Are Enough? The Breast Surgeon's Dilemma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 439 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Schaapveld, E. G. E. de Vries, W. T. A. van der Graaf, R. Otter, J. de Vries, and P. H. B. Willemse
The Prognostic Effect of the Number of Histologically Examined Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Stage Migration or Age Association?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 465 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. S. Ludwig, M. Goodman, D. L. Miller, and P. A. S. Johnstone
Postoperative Survival and the Number of Lymph Nodes Sampled During Resection of Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1545 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. Rouzier and G. N. Hortobagyi
The Removal of Regional Nodes Even When "Pathologically Negative" for Long-term Survival Should be Discussed Cautiously
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 11(9): 879 - 880.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. M. McMasters
The Eternally Enigmatic Axilla: Further Controversy About Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2003; 10(10): 1128 - 1130.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.