Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wrightson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by McMasters, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wrightson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by McMasters, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Annals of Surgical Oncology 10:676-680 (2003)
© 2003 Society of Surgical Oncology


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma

William R. Wrightson, MD, Sandra L. Wong, MD, Michael J. Edwards, MD, Celia Chao, MD, Douglas S. Reintgen, MD, Merrick I. Ross, MD, R. Dirk Noyes, MD, Vicki Viar, RN, MSN, Patricia B. Cerrito, PhD and Kelly M. McMasters, MD, PhD for the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial Study Group

From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, and Center for Advanced Surgical Technology of Norton Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky (WRW, SLW, MJE, CC, VV, KMM); Department of Mathematics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky (PBC); University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (DSR); University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (MIR); and LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah (RDN).

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kelly M. McMasters, MD, PhD, University of Louisville, J. Graham Brown Cancer Center, 529 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY 40202; Fax: 502-629-3379; E-mail: kelly.mcmasters{at}nortonhealthcare.org

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become widely accepted as a method of staging the regional lymph nodes for patients with melanoma. Although it is often stated that SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure associated with few complications, a paucity of data exists to specifically determine the morbidity associated with this procedure. This analysis was performed to evaluate the morbidity associated with SLN biopsy compared with completion lymph node dissection (CLND).

Methods: Patients were enrolled in the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, a prospective multi-institutional study of SLN biopsy for melanoma. Patients underwent SLN biopsy and were prospectively followed up for the development of complications associated with this technique. Patients who had evidence of nodal metastasis in the SLN underwent CLND. Complications associated with SLN biopsy alone were compared with those associated with SLN biopsy plus CLND.

Results: A total of 2120 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 16 months. Overall, 96 (4.6%) of 2120 patients developed major or minor complications associated with SLN biopsy, whereas 103 (23.2%) of 444 patients experienced complications associated with SLN biopsy plus CLND. There were no deaths associated with either procedure.

Conclusions: SLN biopsy alone is associated with significantly less morbidity compared with SLN biopsy plus CLND.

Key Words: Melanoma • Sentinel lymph node • Morbidity • Complications • Lymph node dissection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. E. Gershenwald, R. H.I. Andtbacka, V. G. Prieto, M. M. Johnson, A. H. Diwan, J. E. Lee, P. F. Mansfield, J. N. Cormier, C. W. Schacherer, and M. I. Ross
Microscopic Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Predicts Synchronous Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4296 - 4303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. Y. Bilimoria, C. M. Balch, D. J. Bentrem, M. S. Talamonti, C. Y. Ko, J. R. Lange, D. P. Winchester, and J. D. Wayne
Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma: Assessment of Practice Patterns in the United States
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1566 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. M. Lewis, J. S. Zager, D. Yu, D. Pelaez, A. I. Riker, S. Dessureault, C. W. Cruse, D. S. Reintgen, C. A. Puleo, and V. K. Sondak
Full-Thickness Grafts Procured from Skin Overlying the Sentinel Lymph Node Basin; Reconstruction of Primary Cutaneous Malignancy Excision Defects
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1733 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. I. Ross and J. E. Gershenwald
How Should We View the Results of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-1 (MSLT-1)?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 670 - 673.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Beavis, M. Dawson, P. Doble, R. A. Scolyer, R. Bourne, L.-X. L. Li, R. Murali, J. R. Stretch, C. L. Lean, R. F. Uren, et al.
Confirmation of Sentinel Lymph Node Identity by Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Samples Using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 934 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
V. Soo, P. Shen, R. Pichardo, H. Azzazy, J. H. Stewart, K. R. Geisinger, and E. A. Levine
Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Melanoma by Imprint Cytology
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1612 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. Mocellin, A. Ambrosi, M. C. Montesco, M. Foletto, G. Zavagno, D. Nitti, M. Lise, and C. R. Rossi
Support Vector Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Sentinel Node Status in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1113 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. I. Ross
Early-stage melanoma: staging criteria and prognostic modeling.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2312s - 2319s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. L. Wong, M. S. Brady, K. J. Busam, and D. G. Coit
Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thin Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 13(3): 302 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. Vaquerano, W. G. Kraybill, D. L. Driscoll, R. Cheney, and J. M. Kane III
American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage as a Selection Criterion for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. N. MacNeill, D. Ghazarian, D. McCready, and L. Rotstein
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 12(9): 726 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. G. Coit
In-Transit Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Primum Non Nocere
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 12(8): 575 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. B. Roaten, N. Pearlman, R. Gonzalez, R. Gonzalez, and M. D. McCarter
Identifying Risk Factors for Complications Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma
Arch Surg, January 1, 2005; 140(1): 85 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. Tsao, M. B. Atkins, and A. J. Sober
Management of Cutaneous Melanoma
N. Engl. J. Med., September 2, 2004; 351(10): 998 - 1012.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. M. Pawlik, M. I. Ross, and J. E. Gershenwald
Lymphatic Mapping in the Molecular Era
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 11(4): 362 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.