| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Departments of Surgery (LAN, KAC, SS, DLB, MAK, MW), Medical Oncology (PIP), and Pathology (NLP, VA, DWV), Karmanos Cancer Institute and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Lisa A. Newman, MD, MPH, FACS, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3308 Cancer Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0932; Fax: 734-647-9647; E-mail: lanewman{at}med.umich.edu
Background: The benefits of primary tumor downstaging and assessment of chemoresponsiveness have resulted in expanded applications for induction chemotherapy. However, the pathologic evaluation and prognostic significance of response in preoperatively treated lymph nodes have not been defined.
Methods: The axillary lymph nodes of 71 patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with induction chemotherapy were evaluated for histological evidence of tumor regression as defined by the presence of nodal fibrosis, mucin pools, or aggregates of foamy histiocytes.
Results: Complete pathologic response in the breast and axilla occurred in 10 patients (14%); 19 (26.8%) had evidence of tumor regression in 1 or more lymph nodes. Patients without nodal metastases and no evidence of tumor regression had the best outcome (median disease-free survival, 31.5 months; relapse rate, 27%). Patients with residual nodal metastases and no evidence of treatment effect had the worst outcome (median disease-free survival, 19.8 months; relapse rate, 55%). The median disease-free survival was 22.1 months, and the relapse rate was 32% for patients with histopathologic evidence of tumor regression in the axillary lymph nodes.
Conclusions: Detection of treatment effect in axillary lymph nodes after induction chemotherapy identifies a subset of patients with an outcome intermediate between that of completely node-negative and node-positive patients. The axillary lymph nodes of patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy should be routinely analyzed for the presence of these features.
Key Words: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Axillary lymph nodes Breast cancer
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Jeruss, E. A. Mittendorf, S. L. Tucker, A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo, T. A. Buchholz, A. A. Sahin, J. N. Cormier, A. U. Buzdar, G. N. Hortobagyi, and K. K. Hunt Combined Use of Clinical and Pathologic Staging Variables to Define Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2008; 26(2): 246 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Klauber-DeMore, D. W. Ollila, D. T. Moore, C. Livasy, B. F. Calvo, H. J. Kim, E. C. Dees, C. I. Sartor, L. R. Sawyer, M. Graham II, et al. Size of Residual Lymph Node Metastasis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Is Prognostic Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2006; 13(5): 685 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Lyman, A. E. Giuliano, M. R. Somerfield, A. B. Benson III, D. C. Bodurka, H. J. Burstein, A. J. Cochran, H. S. Cody III, S. B. Edge, S. Galper, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7703 - 7720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Khan, M. S. Sabel, A. Nees, K. M. Diehl, V. M. Cimmino, C. G. Kleer, A. F. Schott, D. F. Hayes, A. E. Chang, and L. A. Newman Comprehensive Axillary Evaluation in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients With Ultrasonography and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 12(9): 697 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. O. Anderson Pathologic Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapy: The New Biological Paradigm for Predicting Outcome and Planning Therapy Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2003; 10(7): 713 - 715. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |