Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Ann Surg Oncol Early Release 10.1245/ASO.2004.01.013 on September 20, 2004

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11:928-933 (2004)
© 2004 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, G.

Article

The Combination Assay with Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-C, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, and VEGF for Diagnosing Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Masaya Tamura, MD, Makoto Oda, MD, Isao Matsumoto, MD, Yoshio Tsunezuka, MD, Kazuyuki Kawakami, MD, Yasuhiko Ohta, MD and Go Watanabe, MD

From the Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery (MT, MO, IM, YT, KK, GW), Kanazawa University School of Medicine; and Department of Thoracic Surgery (YO), Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and VEGF and to verify that the combination assay of these circulating factors is a clinically useful indicator to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: A series of 78 patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC was used in this study. Serum VEGF-C and VEGF and plasma MMP-9 levels were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the influence of VEGF-C, MMP, and VEGF levels on the probability of presence or absence of lymph node metastasis.

Results: Patients with lymph node metastasis had higher serum VEGF- C, VEGF, and plasma MMP-9 concentrations than did those without metastasis (VEGF-C, P = .0004; VEGF, P = .001). Serum VEGF- C reached a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 68% when a cutoff value of 1762.0 pg/mL was applied, while VEGF reached 80% sensitivity and 59% specificity at 316.8 pg/mL. MMP-9 reached a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 75% when a cutoff value of 51.4 ng/mL was applied. In the ROC curve analysis, VEGF-C (0.761) had the biggest areas under the ROC curve, followed by MMP-9 (0.723) and VEGF (0.694). Combination assay of three markers had higher sensitivity and specificity for prediction than single-marker assays (AUC = 0.837).

Conclusions: This study has confirmed that combination assay of three markers to determine VEGF-C, MMP-9, and VEGF expression in circulation detects lymph node metastasis in NSCLC with higher accuracy than single-marker assays.

Key Words: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay • Lymph node metastasis • Matrix metalloproteinase-9 • Vascular endothelial growth factor • Vascular endothelial growth factor-C




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C.-Y. Wu, M.-S. Wu, E.-P. Chiang, Y.-J. Chen, C.-J. Chen, N.-H. Chi, Y.-T. Shih, G.-H. Chen, and J.-T. Lin
Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Level Is Better than Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Level to Predict Gastric Cancer Evolution
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 2054 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. Mizuguchi, K. Inoue, T. Iwata, T. Nishida, N. Izumi, T. Tsukioka, N. Nishiyama, T. Uenishi, and S. Suehiro
High Serum Concentrations of Sialyl Lewisx Predict Multilevel N2 Disease in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 13(7): 1010 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.