Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2004.12.005
Annals of Surgical Oncology 11:1005-1010 (2004)
© 2004 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortunato, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vitelli, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fortunato, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vitelli, C. E.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Intraoperative Examination of Sentinel Nodes in Breast Cancer: Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty?

Lucio Fortunato, MD, Mostafà Amini, MD, Massimo Farina, MD, Simonetta Rapacchietta, MD, Leopoldo Costarelli, MD, Francesca R. Piro, MD, Giuseppe Alessi, MD, Pierluigi Pompili, MD, Salvatore Bianca, MD and Carlo Eugenio Vitelli, MD

From the Departments of General and Surgical Oncology (LF, MF, SR, SB, CEV), Radiology (GA), and Medicine (PP), MG Vannini Hospital, Rome, Italy; and Department of Pathology (MA, LC, FRP), San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Lucio Fortunato, MD, Ospedale MG Vannini, Via Acqua Bullicante, 4, 00177 Rome, Italy; Fax: 39-06-24-29-1326; E-mail: lfortunato{at}tiscali.it

Background: Intraoperative identification of positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer may avoid a return to the operating room.

Methods: In a group of 402 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, an intraoperative examination (IE) was obtained in 236 cases either by frozen section (FS; n = 68) or by touch preparation cytology (TP; n = 168).

Results: IE had an accuracy of 89% (209 of 236), but it identified only 52 of 77 positive cases (sensitivity, 68%). There were 25 false-negative cases (13.7%), of which 7 were macrometastases and 18 by micrometastases (P < .001). Six macrometastases were missed by TP and one by FS (P = .9). There were two false-positive cases (3.7%). Overall, 48 (20%) of 236 patients avoided a delayed return to the operating room for a completion lymphadenectomy because of IE findings. This occurred in 10% of patients with tumors <1 cm in diameter, in 20% of those with tumors between 1 and 2 cm, and in 34% of those with tumors >2 cm in diameter (P = .05). The cost savings for the Italian Health System amounted to 198,040 (US$223,794) in these patients.

Conclusions: IE has acceptable sensitivity for lymph node macrometastases, but it is a weak tool for diagnosing micrometastases. FS and TP are roughly equivalent. IE allows management changes, because approximately 20% of all patients are expected to undergo synchronous axillary dissection, and it is particularly helpful in T2 patients. This may allow substantial cost savings for the health-care system.

Key Words: Breast cancer • Sentinel lymph node • Frozen section • Cytology • Immunohistochemistry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. Shimazu, Y. Tamaki, T. Taguchi, F. Tsukamoto, T. Kasugai, and S. Noguchi
Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1717 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
N. Arora, D. Martins, T. L. Huston, P. Christos, S. Hoda, M. P. Osborne, A. J. Swistel, E. Tousimis, P. I. Pressman, and R. M. Simmons
Sentinel Node Positivity Rates With and Without Frozen Section for Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. D. Nathanson, M. Burke, R. Slater, and A. Kapke
Preoperative Identification of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3102 - 3110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
C. Teixeira Soares, U. Frederigue-Junior, and L. A. de Luca
Anatomopathological Analysis of Sentinel and Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Hematoxylin-Eosin Versus Immunohistochemistry
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, October 1, 2007; 15(4): 358 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Tsujimoto, K. Nakabayashi, K. Yoshidome, T. Kaneko, T. Iwase, F. Akiyama, Y. Kato, H. Tsuda, S. Ueda, K. Sato, et al.
One-step Nucleic Acid Amplification for Intraoperative Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4807 - 4816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.