| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Departments of General and Surgical Oncology (LF, MF, SR, SB, CEV), Radiology (GA), and Medicine (PP), MG Vannini Hospital, Rome, Italy; and Department of Pathology (MA, LC, FRP), San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Lucio Fortunato, MD, Ospedale MG Vannini, Via Acqua Bullicante, 4, 00177 Rome, Italy; Fax: 39-06-24-29-1326; E-mail: lfortunato{at}tiscali.it
Background: Intraoperative identification of positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer may avoid a return to the operating room.
Methods: In a group of 402 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, an intraoperative examination (IE) was obtained in 236 cases either by frozen section (FS; n = 68) or by touch preparation cytology (TP; n = 168).
Results: IE had an accuracy of 89% (209 of 236), but it identified only 52 of 77 positive cases (sensitivity, 68%). There were 25 false-negative cases (13.7%), of which 7 were macrometastases and 18 by micrometastases (P < .001). Six macrometastases were missed by TP and one by FS (P = .9). There were two false-positive cases (3.7%). Overall, 48 (20%) of 236 patients avoided a delayed return to the operating room for a completion lymphadenectomy because of IE findings. This occurred in 10% of patients with tumors <1 cm in diameter, in 20% of those with tumors between 1 and 2 cm, and in 34% of those with tumors >2 cm in diameter (P = .05). The cost savings for the Italian Health System amounted to 198,040 (US$223,794) in these patients.
Conclusions: IE has acceptable sensitivity for lymph node macrometastases, but it is a weak tool for diagnosing micrometastases. FS and TP are roughly equivalent. IE allows management changes, because approximately 20% of all patients are expected to undergo synchronous axillary dissection, and it is particularly helpful in T2 patients. This may allow substantial cost savings for the health-care system.
Key Words: Breast cancer Sentinel lymph node Frozen section Cytology Immunohistochemistry
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Shimazu, Y. Tamaki, T. Taguchi, F. Tsukamoto, T. Kasugai, and S. Noguchi Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1717 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Arora, D. Martins, T. L. Huston, P. Christos, S. Hoda, M. P. Osborne, A. J. Swistel, E. Tousimis, P. I. Pressman, and R. M. Simmons Sentinel Node Positivity Rates With and Without Frozen Section for Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 256 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Nathanson, M. Burke, R. Slater, and A. Kapke Preoperative Identification of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3102 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Teixeira Soares, U. Frederigue-Junior, and L. A. de Luca Anatomopathological Analysis of Sentinel and Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Hematoxylin-Eosin Versus Immunohistochemistry International Journal of Surgical Pathology, October 1, 2007; 15(4): 358 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tsujimoto, K. Nakabayashi, K. Yoshidome, T. Kaneko, T. Iwase, F. Akiyama, Y. Kato, H. Tsuda, S. Ueda, K. Sato, et al. One-step Nucleic Acid Amplification for Intraoperative Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4807 - 4816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |