| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Departments of Surgery (VKS, MSS, ACG, AEC, AMY, TMJ), Biostatistics (JMGT, YW, JM), Pathology (LL), Dermatology (LL, TMJ), and Otolaryngology (TMJ), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Vernon K. Sondak, MD, Room 3306, Cancer Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0932; Fax: 734-647-9647; E-mail: vsondak{at}umich.edu
Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allows surgeons to identify patients with subclinical nodal involvement who may benefit from lymphadenectomy and, possibly, adjuvant therapy. Several factors have been variably, and sometimes discordantly, reported to have predictive value for SLN metastasis to best select which patients require SLN biopsy.
Methods: We reviewed 419 patients who underwent SLN biopsy for melanoma from a prospectively collected melanoma database. To derive a probabilistic model for the occurrence of a positive SLN, a multivariate logistic model was fit by using a stepwise variable selection method. The accuracy of each model was evaluated by using receiver operator characteristic curves.
Results: On univariate analysis, the number of mitoses per square millimeter, increasing Breslow depth, decreasing age, ulceration, and melanoma on the trunk showed a significant relationship to a positive SLN. Multivariate analysis revealed that once age, mitotic rate, and Breslow thickness were included, no other factor, including ulceration, was significantly associated with a positive SLN. The data suggest that younger patients with tumors <1 mm may still have a substantial risk for a positive SLN, especially if the mitotic rate is high.
Conclusions: In addition to Breslow depth, mitoses per square millimeter and younger age were factors identified as independent predictors of a positive SLN. This model may identify patients with thin melanoma at sufficient risk for metastases to justify SLN biopsy.
Key Words: Melanoma Sentinel lymph node Mitotic rate Ulceration
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L. Frankel, K. A. Griffith, L. Lowe, S. L. Wong, C. K. Bichakjian, A. E. Chang, V. M. Cimmino, C. R. Bradford, R. S. Rees, T. M Johnson, et al. Do Micromorphometric Features of Metastatic Deposits Within Sentinel Nodes Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Melanoma? Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2403 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Niakosari, H. J. Kahn, D. McCready, D. Ghazarian, L. E. Rotstein, A. Marks, A. Kiss, and L. From Lymphatic Invasion Identified by Monoclonal Antibody D2-40, Younger Age, and Ulceration: Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2008; 144(4): 462 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. K. Sondak and J. L. Messina Lymphangiogenesis: Host and Tumor Factors in Nodal Metastasis Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2008; 144(4): 536 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sassen, H. M. Shaw, M. H. Colman, R. A. Scolyer, and J. F. Thompson The Complex Relationships Between Sentinel Node Positivity, Patient Age, and Primary Tumor Desmoplasia: Analysis of 2303 Melanoma Patients Treated at a Single Center Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Murali, R. N. Sharma, J. F. Thompson, J. R. Stretch, C. S. Lee, S. W. McCarthy, and R. A. Scolyer Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Histologically Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors With Spitzoid Features (So-Called Atypical Spitzoid Tumors) Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 302 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lange and C. M. Balch Melanoma in Older Patients ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 399 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Karakousis, P. A. Gimotty, B. J. Czerniecki, D. E. Elder, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, D. L. Fraker, D. Guerry, and F. R. Spitz Regional Nodal Metastatic Disease Is the Strongest Predictor of Survival in Patients with Thin Vertical Growth Phase Melanomas: A Case for SLN Staging Biopsy in These Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1596 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lange, B. E. Palis, D. C. Chang, S.-J. Soong, and C. M. Balch Melanoma in Children and Teenagers: An Analysis of Patients From the National Cancer Data Base J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Gimotty, D. E. Elder, D. L. Fraker, J. Botbyl, K. Sellers, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, L. Schuchter, F. R. Spitz, B. J. Czerniecki, et al. Identification of High-Risk Patients Among Those Diagnosed With Thin Cutaneous Melanomas J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1129 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Taylor, A. Patel, K. S. Panageas, K. J. Busam, and M. S. Brady Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 869 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Stell, H. J. Norton, K. S. Smith, J. C. Salo, and R. L. White Jr. Method of Biopsy and Incidence of Positive Margins in Primary Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. McHugh, L. Su, K. A. Griffith, J. L. Schwartz, S. L. Wong, V. Cimmino, A. E. Chang, T. M. Johnson, and M. S. Sabel Significance of Multiple Lymphatic Basin Drainage in Truncal Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 13(9): 1216 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mocellin, A. Ambrosi, M. C. Montesco, M. Foletto, G. Zavagno, D. Nitti, M. Lise, and C. R. Rossi Support Vector Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Sentinel Node Status in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1113 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Karakousis, P. A. Gimotty, J. D. Botbyl, S. B. Kesmodel, D. E. Elder, R. Elenitsas, M. E. Ming, D. Guerry, D. L. Fraker, B. J. Czerniecki, et al. Predictors of Regional Nodal Disease in Patients With Thin Melanomas Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Elder Pathology of melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2308s - 2311s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Thompson and H. M. Shaw Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Appropriate in Patients With Thin Melanomas: Too Early To Tell? Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 13(3): 279 - 281. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wong, M. S. Brady, K. J. Busam, and D. G. Coit Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thin Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 13(3): 302 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vaquerano, W. G. Kraybill, D. L. Driscoll, R. Cheney, and J. M. Kane III American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage as a Selection Criterion for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 198 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Rossi, G. L. De Salvo, G. Trifiro, S. Mocellin, G. Landi, G. Macripo, P. Carcoforo, G. Ricotti, G. Giudice, F. Picciotto, et al. The Impact of Lymphoscintigraphy Technique on the Outcome of Sentinel Node Biopsy in 1,313 Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma: An Italian Multicentric Study (SOLISM-IMI) J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 234 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Berk, D. L. Johnson, A. Uzieblo, M. Kiernan, and S. M. Swetter Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma: The Stanford Experience, 1997-2004 Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2005; 141(8): 1016 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Strouse, T. R. Fears, M. A. Tucker, and A. S. Wayne Pediatric Melanoma: Risk Factor and Survival Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4735 - 4741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Kesmodel, G. C. Karakousis, J. D. Botbyl, R. J. Canter, R. T. Lewis, P. M. Wahl, K. P. Terhune, A. Alavi, D. E. Elder, M. E. Ming, et al. Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 12(6): 449 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wong, M. W. Kattan, K. M. McMasters, and D. G. Coit A Nomogram That Predicts the Presence of Sentinel Node Metastasis in Melanoma With Better Discrimination Than the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 12(4): 282 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Stitzenberg, P. A. Groben, S. L. Stern, N. E. Thomas, T. A. Hensing, L. B. Sansbury, and D. W. Ollila Indications for Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Thin Melanoma (Breslow Thickness <=1.0 mm) Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2004; 11(10): 900 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Doubrovsky, J.H.W. de Wilt, R.A. Scolyer, W.H. McCarthy, and J.F. Thompson Sentinel Node Biopsy Provides More Accurate Staging Than Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 11(9): 829 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Thompson and H. M. Shaw Editorial: Should Tumor Mitotic Rate and Patient Age, As Well As Tumor Thickness, be Used to Select Melanoma Patients for Sentinel Node Biopsy? Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3): 233 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |