This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Starz, H. Articles by Balda, B.-R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Starz, H. Articles by Balda, B.-R.

Sentinel Lymphonodectomy and S-Classification: A Successful Strategy for Better Prediction and Improvement of Outcome of Melanoma

From the Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Hans Starz, MD, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, D-86156 Augsburg, Germany; Fax: 49-821-4003336; E-mail: hstarz{at}web.de

ABSTRACT

The most successful strategies in the management of melanoma have always been based on early diagnosis and timely surgical removal. Sentinel lymphonodectomy (SLNE) is the most reliable technique for the detection of melanoma micrometastases in regional lymph nodes. The micromorphometric S-classification, a routinely determinable surrogate of tumor burden in the sentinel lymph node (SLN), has high prognostic relevance. SIII metastases, defined by a depth of invasion (d) greater than 1 mm below the capsular level, imply a risk of more than 50% for the presence of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in the same basin and for the emergence of distant metastases within 5 years of follow-up. Corresponding risks with SI metastases (d 0.3 mm) and SII metastases (0.3 mm < d 1 mm) do not exceed 15%. The survival curve for patients with SIII metastases approaches that of patients in the pre-SLNE era who underwent delayed lymph node dissection for subsequently detected nodal macrometastases. The survival of patients with initially removed SI and SII metastases is much better, similar to that of patients with S0 metastases. This explains the significant survival benefit of SLN-guided surgery in the entire population of patients with melanomas thicker than 0.75 mm, although the outcome of the subgroup without nodal metastases is not influenced by SLNE.

Key Words: Benefit • Melanoma • Metastasis • Morphometry • Prognosis • Sentinel lymph node

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Y. Bilimoria, C. M. Balch, D. J. Bentrem, M. S. Talamonti, C. Y. Ko, J. R. Lange, D. P. Winchester, and J. D. Wayne Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma: Assessment of Practice Patterns in the United States Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1566 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Satzger, B. Volker, A. Meier, A. Kapp, and R. Gutzmer Criteria in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Melanoma Patients that Predict Involvement of Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1723 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Rossi, G. L. De Salvo, E. Bonandini, S. Mocellin, M. Foletto, S. Pasquali, P. Pilati, M. Lise, D. Nitti, E. Rizzo, et al. Factors Predictive of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement and Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1202 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Fink, H. Lass, H. Hartleb, W. Jurecka, H. Salzer, and A. Steiner S-Classification of Sentinel Lymph Node Predicts Axillary Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Patients with Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 848 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Koskivuo, L. Talve, P. Vihinen, M. Maki, T. Vahlberg, and E. Suominen Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Case-Control Study Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3566 - 3574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Scolyer, R Murali, J. Gershenwald, A. Cochran, and J. Thompson Clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases in sentinel nodes: too early to tell Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 806 - 808. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Govindarajan, D. M. Ghazarian, D. R. McCready, and W. L. Leong Histological Features of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases Associated with Status of the Completion Lymphadenectomy and Rate of Subsequent Relapse Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 906 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. van Akkooi, J. de Wilt, C Verhoef, P. Schmitz, A. van Geel, A. Eggermont, and M Kliffen Clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (<0.1 mm) in sentinel nodes: are these nodes to be considered negative? Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1578 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Cascinelli, E. Bombardieri, R. Bufalino, T. Camerini, A. Carbone, C. Clemente, L. Lenisa, L. Mascheroni, A. Maurichi, E. Pennacchioli, et al. Sentinel and Nonsentinel Node Status in Stage IB and II Melanoma Patients: Two-Step Prognostic Indicators of Survival J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2006; 24(27): 4464 - 4471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kretschmer, I. Beckmann, K.-M. Thoms, C. Mitteldorf, H. P. Bertsch, and C. Neumann Factors Predicting the Risk of In-Transit Recurrence After Sentinel Lymphonodectomy in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1105 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Abratt, W. H.H. Reece, N. H. Enas, and R. Stephens Randomized phase II studies and their ethics. J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9443 - 9443. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Thomas Time to Re-Evaluate Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9443 - 9444. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. McMasters Editorial: What Good is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma if it does not Improve Survival? Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 11(9): 810 - 812. [Full Text] [PDF]