| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
SUPPLEMENT |
From the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, and UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion, San Francisco, California.
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Stanley P. L. Leong, MD, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center at Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero Street, Room C333, San Francisco, CA 941431674; Fax: 415-353-7721; E-mail: leongs{at}surgery.ucsf.edu
ABSTRACT
Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for patients with melanoma and breast cancer. Because it is the first node draining the primary cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is most likely to harbor metastatic cancer cells. The Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma and the size of primary breast cancer are highly correlated with SLN metastasis. If the SLN is negative, its negative predictive value for the remaining nodal basin exceeds 95%; thus, survival rates for melanoma and breast cancer increase when the SLN is negative. The rate of SLN identification is more than 95%, and the false-negative rate is about 5%. SLN data from melanoma and breast cancer are so convincing that they have been incorporated into the new American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of these cancers. The therapeutic value of additional lymph node dissection after a positive SLN for melanoma or breast cancer is still controversial. In melanoma, a 3-year follow-up may confirm better survival when the SLN is negative. However, about 25% of histologically negative SLNs may be upstaged by molecular techniques, and patients whose SLNs are positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay may develop recurrence. In most cases, melanoma and breast cancer follow an orderly progression of metastasis to the SLN; however, a small subgroup may develop systemic dissemination without SLN involvement. Current SLN experience has confirmed that the earlier the cancer, the less its potential for metastasis. Since treatments for metastatic cancer are still limited, early detection and resection are imperative. Better understanding of the molecular and genetic mechanisms of metastasis will be critical to select high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy.
Key Words: Breast cancer Melanoma Metastasis Sentinel nodes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mocellin, A. Ambrosi, M. C. Montesco, M. Foletto, G. Zavagno, D. Nitti, M. Lise, and C. R. Rossi Support Vector Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Sentinel Node Status in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 13(8): 1113 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |