Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Ann Surg Oncol Early Release 10.1245/ASO.2004.01.023 on July 12, 2004

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11:731-738 (2004)
© 2004 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sherry, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sherry, R. M.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A Prospective Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma in Patients Undergoing Metastasectomy

Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, MD, John M. Hoffman, MD, Barbara Galen, RN, Peter Choyke, MD, Donald E. White, MS, Steven A. Rosenberg, MD, PhD and Richard M. Sherry, MD

From the Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (SEF, DEW, SAR, RMS), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center (JAC, BG), Molecular Imaging Branch, Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (JMH), and Diagnostic Radiology Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center (PC), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Richard M. Sherry, MD, Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 2338, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892; Fax: 301-402-0922; E-mail: richard_sherry{at}nih.gov

Background: Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG-PET) is available for evaluation of patients with melanoma. This study evaluates the potential of FDG-PET to improve on conventional imaging (CI) in patients with stage IV melanoma undergoing metastasectomy.

Methods: This was a prospective study comparing radiological evaluation of patients who underwent metastasectomy for palliation or cure. Patients underwent preoperative evaluation by physical examination, CI by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and FDG-PET. Independent observers performed three separate analyses of CI alone, FDG-PET alone, or FDG-PET read with knowledge of CI (FDG-PET + CI). Abnormalities were reported as benign or malignant and assessed by pathologic analysis or by clinical outcome determined by disease progression detected on serial evaluations.

Results: Ninety-four lesions were noted in 18 patients who underwent preoperative assessment, metastasectomy, and long-term follow up (median, 24 months). Lesion-by-lesion analysis for CI demonstrated a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 87%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 76%. FDG-PET demonstrated a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 86%, and an NPV of 80%. For FDG-PET + CI, the sensitivity was 88%, specificity was 91%, and PPV and NPV were 91% and 88%, respectively.

Conclusions: Combined use of FDG-PET and CI may be an accurate strategy to identify sites of disease in patients with stage IV melanoma being considered for metastasectomy. Interpreted independently, FDG-PET and CI seemed to be equivalent modalities. FDG-PET + CI had both the highest sensitivity on lesion-by-lesion analysis and the best accuracy on patient-by-patient analysis.

Key Words: Melanoma • Cancer • FDG-PET • Imaging • Metastasectomy • Surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. M. Pawlik, J. J. Erasmus, M. T. Truong, H. Macapinlac, M. I. Ross, and J. E. Gershenwald
Acne vulgaris: false-positive finding on integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with melanoma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W117 - W119.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. D. Wagner
Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Melanoma Staging: Refining the Indications
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 444 - 446.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. S. Brady, T. Akhurst, K. Spanknebel, S. Hilton, M. Gonen, A. Patel, and S. Larson
Utility of Preoperative [(18)]F Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Scanning in High-Risk Melanoma Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.