Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2005.03.032
Annals of Surgical Oncology 12:29-33 (2005)
© 2005 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smidt, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strobbe, L. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smidt, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strobbe, L. J. A.

Original Article

Axillary Recurrence After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Incidence and Clinical Significance

Marjolein L. Smidt, MD, Caroline M. M. Janssen, MD, Deborah M. Kuster, MD, Erik D. M. Bruggink, MD, PhD and Luc J. A. Strobbe, MD, PhD

Department of Surgical Oncology, C22, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, PO Box 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marjolein L. Smidt, MD; E-mail: marjoleinsmidt{at}yahoo.com

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) carries the inherent risk of approximately 5% false-negative sampling. Undetected tumor-positive nodes of clinical importance are those that lead to axillary recurrence. This survey aims at clarifying the extent of this problem in current practice and literature.

Methods: In a regional teaching hospital, 696 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent SLNB between January 1998 and July 2003, and data were entered in a prospective database. PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for a systematic review of the literature. Thirteen studies dealt with the follow-up of a cohort of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients or presented a case report.

Results: The SLN identification rate was 97.1%. The SLN was tumor free in 439 (65%) of the 676 patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, axillary recurrence was detected in 2 of 439 patients 4 and 27 months after the SLNB. The incidence of clinically apparent false-negative SLNB is .46%. The systematic review resulted in 3184 SLNB-negative patients with a median follow-up of 25 months. Axillary recurrence occurred in eight patients after a median of 21 months. The axillary recurrence rate in the literature is .25%. One third of these patients present with synchronous systemic metastases.

Conclusions: Axillary recurrences after a negative SLNB occur, but at a much lower rate than would be expected on the basis of historical figures and the false-negative SLN findings. The natural history of axillary relapse after negative SLNB resembles the locoregional recurrence of breast cancer.

Key Words: Breast neoplasms • Sentinel lymph node biopsy • Neoplasm recurrence • False negative sampling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Sun, S. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Zhao, Y. Luo, and Y. Guo
Identification of Metastasis-Related Proteins and Their Clinical Relevance to Triple-Negative Human Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 7050 - 7059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. L. Koelliker, M. A. Chung, M. B. Mainiero, M. M. Steinhoff, and B. Cady
Axillary Lymph Nodes: US-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Initial Staging of Breast Cancer Correlation with Primary Tumor Size
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 81 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. J. Bolster, P. Bult, R. F. M. Schapers, J. W. R. Meijer, L. J. A. Strobbe, C. L. H. van Berlo, J. H. G. Klinkenbijl, P. G. M. Peer, T. Wobbes, and V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
Differences in Sentinel Lymph Node Pathology Protocols Lead to Differences in Surgical Strategy in Breast Cancer Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 13(11): 1466 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. C. van Rijk, O. E. Nieweg, E. J. T. Rutgers, H. S. A. Oldenburg, R. V. Olmos, C. A. Hoefnagel, and B. B. R. Kroon
Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 475 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
H. C. Snider Jr., E. Rubin, and R. Henson
Axillary Ultrasonography to Detect Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 13(4): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. L. Smidt, D. M. Kuster, G. J. van der Wilt, F. B. Thunnissen, K. J. Van Zee, and L. J. A. Strobbe
Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram Predict the Likelihood of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients in The Netherlands?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1066 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
L. A. Newman
Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer Patients
J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2005; 1(4): 130 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.