Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2005.03.520
Annals of Surgical Oncology 12:1045-1053 (2005)
© 2005 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Van Zee, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Van Zee, K. J.

Original Article

Utility of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Occult Primary Breast Cancer

Claire L. Buchanan, MD1, Elizabeth A. Morris, MD2, Paige L. Dorn, BS1, Patrick I. Borgen, MD1 and Kimberly J. Van Zee, MD1

1 Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021
2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kimberly J. Van Zee, MD; E-mail: vanzeek{at}mskcc.org

Background: Although carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases is assumed to be due to breast cancer, identification of the primary lesion may prove problematic. We investigated the ability of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify the primary tumor, thereby confirming the diagnosis and broadening treatment options.

Methods: From 1995 to 2001, 69 patients at our institution presented with occult primary breast cancer. All patients had negative breast examinations and mammograms and underwent breast MRI.

Results: Of 69 patients, 55 had axillary adenopathy without evidence of distant disease (stage II); 14 had stage IV disease. In patients with stage II disease, MRI revealed suspicious lesions in 76% (42 of 55). In 62% (26 of 42), the MRI finding proved to be the occult primary tumor. Of these, 58% (15 of 26) were candidates for breast conservation. MRI did not identify the primary tumor in 25 women; 12 underwent mastectomy. Cancer was found in 33% (4 of 12) of these. Thirteen patients were treated with primary breast irradiation; three were lost to follow-up, one developed distant disease, and nine were without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. In women with stage IV disease, MRI identified the primary tumor in 5 of 9 patients with regional adenopathy and 2 of 5 patients with distant disease (overall 50%; 7 of 14). MRI identified the primary tumor in women with both mammographically dense (19 of 44; 43%) and less dense (10 of 20; 50%) breasts.

Conclusions: Breast MRI detects mammographically occult cancer in half of women with axillary metastases, regardless of breast density. MRI is a powerful tool for stage II and stage IV patients with occult primary breast cancer.

Key Words: Occult primary breast carcinoma • Axillary metastases • Magnetic resonance imaging • Breast cancer • Breast imaging • Breast irradiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. B. Mendel, M. Long, and P. J. Slanetz
CT-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Breast Lesions Visible Only on MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 152 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. Moy, F. Ponzo, M. E. Noz, G. Q. Maguire Jr., A. D. Murphy-Walcott, A. E. Deans, M. T. Kitazono, L. Travascio, and E. L. Kramer
Improving Specificity of Breast MRI Using Prone PET and Fused MRI and PET 3D Volume Datasets
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 528 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
T. G. ODLE
Breast MR
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2006; 78(1): 45M - 66M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.