Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2005.03.009
Annals of Surgical Oncology 12:971-980 (2005)
© 2005 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roggin, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roggin, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, M. F.

Original Article

Limitations of Ampullectomy in the Treatment of Nonfamilial Ampullary Neoplasms

Kevin K. Roggin, MD1, Jen Jen J. Yeh, MD1, Cristina R. Ferrone, MD1, Elyn Riedel, MS2, Hans Gerdes, MD3, David S. Klimstra, MD4, David P. Jaques, MD1 and Murray F. Brennan, MD1

1 Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021
2 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021
3 Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021
4 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Murray F. Brennan, MD; E-mail: brennanm{at}mskcc.org.

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical management of invasive ampullary neoplasms. A rational plan to use ampullectomy (AMP) for lesions at this location requires careful analysis of preoperative clinical information (comorbidity, lesion size, and histopathology) and intraoperative data (frozen section pathology and clinical impression) to properly select patients for this treatment.

Methods: We identified 140 consecutive cases of nonfamilial ampullary neoplasms from our prospective institutional database over a 7-year period (1996–2003). Preoperative and intraoperative factors were analyzed and related to outcomes.

Results: AMP was planned for 37 patients with small lesions (median, 1.86 cm [range, 0–3 cm] vs. 2.6 cm [range, 0–8 cm] in PD). AMP was converted to PD because of the extent of disease in three and an intraoperative diagnosis of invasive cancer in five patients. Preoperative biopsy had a diagnostic accuracy of 79% (97 of 123) but missed 23 cancers. Intraoperative frozen section had a diagnostic accuracy of 84%; two cases of high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer were missed. Patients with invasive cancer treated by AMP had a decreased recurrence-free and disease-specific survival compared with those treated by PD. Lymphatic spread of disease was associated with diminished long-term survival. Although both vascular invasion and tumor stage independently predicted lymphatic metastases, both were limited by their sensitivity.

Conclusions: The reduced morbidity and mortality of AMP makes this the preferred treatment for benign lesions of the ampulla. Conversion to PD should be considered when intraoperative or final pathology identifies invasive adenocarcinoma. Refinement of clinicopathologic factors may reduce the occasional PD for benign disease and AMP for malignancy.

Key Words: Ampullectomy • Pancreaticoduodenectomy • Periampullary neoplasms • Adenocarcinoma




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Falconi, S. Crippa, I. Dominguez, G. Barugola, P. Capelli, S. Marcucci, S. Beghelli, A. Scarpa, C. Bassi, and P. Pederzoli
Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Ratio and Number of Resected Nodes after Curative Resection of Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 15(11): 3178 - 3186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.