Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2005.06.007
Annals of Surgical Oncology 12:133-137 (2005)
© 2005 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metreveli, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petrelli, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metreveli, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petrelli, N. J.

Original Article

Hepatic Resection at a Major Community-Based Teaching Hospital Can Result in Good Outcome

Ramaz E. Metreveli, MD, Katherine Sahm, MD, Frederick Denstman, MD, Raafat Abdel-Misih, MD and Nicholas J. Petrelli, MD, FACS

Department of Surgery, Christiana Care Health Services, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Suite 1213, Newark, Delaware 19713

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Nicholas J. Petrelli, MD, FACS; E-mail: npetrelli{at}christianacare.org.

Background: The relationship between volume and outcome has been established in the literature for several complex surgical procedures. Improved outcome has been suggested at high-volume hospitals or with high-volume surgeons.

Methods: The objective of this study was to evaluate the experience of a low-volume hospital with major liver resections. The setting of the study was a community-based teaching hospital with a surgical residency training program.

Results: A total of 46 major liver resections were performed between January 1992 and December 2002. Procedures performed were hepatic lobectomies (n = 15; right, n = 11; left, n = 4), trisegmentectomies (n = 5; right, n = 3; left, n = 2), segmentectomies (n = 16; left lateral, n = 12; right posterior, n = 4), and wedge resections (n = 10). Operations were performed by 14 different surgeons; however, 23 operations were performed by 1 surgeon. Sixteen patients (34%) developed 23 complications. The average length of hospital stay was 9.7 days. There were no 30-day postoperative mortalities. Out of 46 patients who underwent major liver resection over the last 10 years, 13 patients are still alive. Overall survival ranged from 3 to 84 months, with a median survival of 30.6 months. The actual 5-year survival was 36% (8 of 22) for all patients operated on >5 years ago, and the actual 2-year survival was 61% (20 of 33).

Conclusions: Major liver resection can be performed safely with low rates of morbidity and operative mortality with careful selection of patients at a low-volume community-based teaching hospital.

Key Words: Hepatic • Colorectal • Metastases • Resection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. Spiliotis, A. Rogdakis, A. C. Datsis, A. Christopoulou, and S. Kekelos
Hepatic Resection at a Major Community-Based Teaching Hospital Can Result in Good Outcome
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 12(11): 951 - 951.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.