Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/ASO.2005.03.020
Annals of Surgical Oncology 12:298-302 (2005)
© 2005 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elias, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lasser, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elias, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lasser, P.

Original Article

Incidence of Unsuspected and Treatable Metastatic Disease Associated With Operable Colorectal Liver Metastases Discovered Only at Laparotomy (and Not Treated When Performing Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation)

D. Elias, MD, PhD1, L. Sideris, MD1, M. Pocard, MD, PhD1, T. de Baere, MD2, C. Dromain, MD2, N. Lassau, MD2 and P. Lasser, MD1

1 Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Cancer Center, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France
2 Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Cancer Center, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: D. Elias, MD, PhD; E-mail: elias{at}igr.fr.

Background: When patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (LM) are treated with percutaneous radiofrequency (RF), some unsuspected intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases, detectable only at laparotomy, might be ignored and left untreated. This would result in a reduced cure rate. Our purpose was to discover the incidence of unsuspected and surgically treatable intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases discovered at laparotomy.

Methods: The data of 506 patients who underwent a laparotomy and then a hepatectomy for colorectal LM were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. All patients had undergone at least two types of preoperative liver imaging (but no fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography).

Results: Unsuspected metastases were discovered at laparotomy in 209 patients (41.3%). There were extrahepatic metastases in 82 patients (16.2%), additional LM in 152 patients (30%), and both in 25 patients (4.9%). Liver palpation and intraoperative ultrasound allowed for detecting additional LM in 125 (24.7%) and 48 (9.4%) patients, respectively. All of them were resected. When only the 124 patients who presented with 1 to 3 LM measuring <3 cm in diameter (candidates for percutaneous RF) were considered, the results were similar. Moreover, the incidence of unsuspected metastases was similar when the periods of surgery (before and after January 1996) were considered.

Conclusions: Laparotomy permits discovery of and treatment with a curative intent of unsuspected intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastases in at least one third of patients with classically resectable colorectal LM. This does not support the use of percutaneous RF ablation instead of hepatic resection for this population, because it will result in an important survival decrease.

Key Words: Liver metastases • Colorectal cancer • Hepatectomy • Radiofrequency ablation • Intraoperative ultrasonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
L. B. J. van Iersel, H. Gelderblom, A. L. Vahrmeijer, E. L. van Persijn van Meerten, F. G. J. Tijl, H. Putter, H. H. Hartgrink, P. J. K. Kuppen, J. W. R. Nortier, R. A. E. M. Tollenaar, et al.
Isolated hepatic melphalan perfusion of colorectal liver metastases: outcome and prognostic factors in 154 patients
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1127 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Adam, D. A. Wicherts, R. J. de Haas, T. Aloia, F. Levi, B. Paule, C. Guettier, F. Kunstlinger, V. Delvart, D. Azoulay, et al.
Complete Pathologic Response After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Myth or Reality?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1635 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. Elias, S. Bonnet, C. Honore, N. Kohneh-Shahri, G. Tomasic, N. Lassau, C. Dromain, and D. Goere
Comparison Between the Minimum Margin Defined on Preoperative Imaging and the Final Surgical Margin After Hepatectomy for Cancer: How to Manage It?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 777 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. Mulier, Y. Ni, J. Jamart, L. Michel, G. Marchal, and T. Ruers
Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Resection for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Time for a Randomized Trial?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 144 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Benoist, A. Brouquet, C. Penna, C. Julie, M. El Hajjam, S. Chagnon, E. Mitry, P. Rougier, and B. Nordlinger
Complete Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Chemotherapy: Does It Mean Cure?
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2006; 24(24): 3939 - 3945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.