| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
1 Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Radiology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4 Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Maartje C. van Rijk, MD; E-mail: m.v.rijk{at}nki.nl
Background: Some 30% to 40% of the breast cancer patients scheduled for sentinel node biopsy have axillary metastasis. Pilot studies suggest that ultrasonography is useful in the preoperative detection of such nodes. The aims of this study were to evaluate the sensitivity of preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology for detecting axillary metastases and to assess how often sentinel node biopsy could be avoided.
Methods: Between October 1999 and December 2003, 726 patients with clinically negative lymph nodes were eligible for sentinel node biopsy. A total of 732 axillae were examined. Preoperative ultrasonography with subsequent fine-needle aspiration cytology in case of suspicious lymph nodes was performed in all patients. The sentinel node procedure was omitted in patients with tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes in lieu of axillary lymph node dissection.
Results: Ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology established axillary metastases in 58 (8%) of the 726 patients. These 58 were 21% of the total of 271 patients who were proven to have axillary metastasis in the end. Of the patients with ultrasonographically suspicious lymph nodes and negative cytology, 31% had tumor-positive sentinel nodes. Patients with preoperatively established metastases by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology had more tumor-positive lymph nodes (P < .001) than patients with metastases established later on.
Conclusions: The sensitivity of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology is 21%, and unnecessary sentinel node biopsy is avoided in 8% of the patients. This approach improves the selection of patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy.
Key Words: Ultrasonography Mammary Breast neoplasms Lymphatic metastasis Sentinel lymph node biopsy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A.P. Leijte, I. M.C. van der Ploeg, R. A. Valdes Olmos, O. E. Nieweg, and S. Horenblas Visualization of Tumor Blockage and Rerouting of Lymphatic Drainage in Penile Cancer Patients by Use of SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 364 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Abe, R. A. Schmidt, K. Kulkarni, C. A. Sennett, J. S. Mueller, and G. M. Newstead Axillary Lymph Nodes Suspicious for Breast Cancer Metastasis: Sampling with US-guided 14-Gauge Core-Needle Biopsy--Clinical Experience in 100 Patients Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 41 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A MOORE, M HESTER, M-W NAM, Y M BRILL, P McGRATH, H WRIGHT, K WEISINGER, E ROMOND, and L M SAMAYOA Distinct lymph nodal sonographic characteristics in breast cancer patients at high risk for axillary metastases correlate with the final axillary stage Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2008; 81(968): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jain, M. E. Haisfield-Wolfe, J. Lange, N. Ahuja, N. Khouri, T. Tsangaris, Z. Zhang, C. Balch, and L. K. Jacobs The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Axillary Nodes in the Staging of Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 462 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Davis, Y. M. Brill, S. Simmons, B. C. Sachleben, M. L. Cibull, P. McGrath, H. Wright, E. Romond, M. Hester, A. Moore, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Clinically Negative Lymph Nodes Versus Sentinel Node Mapping in Patients at High Risk for Axillary Metastasis Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1545 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |