| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
Department of Surgical Oncology & Technology, Imperial College London, St. Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alexander G. Heriot, MD, FRCS; E-mail: a.heriot{at}imperial.ac.uk.
Background: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery aims to provide patients with curative resection while minimizing postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study used meta-analytical techniques to compare laparoscopic and open surgery as the primary treatment for patients with rectal cancer with regard to short-term and long-term outcomes.
Methods: A literature search was performed on all studies between 1993 and 2004 comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. The following end points were evaluated: operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and early and late adverse events.
Results: Twenty studies matched the selection criteria and reported on 2071 subjects, of whom 909 (44%) underwent laparoscopic and 1162 (56%) underwent open surgery for rectal cancer. Time to stomal function (weighted mean difference [WMD], –1.52; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], –2.20, –1.01), first bowel movement (WMD, –.72; 95% CI, –1.21,–.22), feeding solids (WMD, –.92; 95% CI, –1.35,–.50), and length of hospital stay (WMD, –2.67; 95% CI, –3.81, –1.54) were all significantly reduced after laparoscopic surgery. In patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision of the rectum, wound infection (odds ratio, .15; 95% CI, .03, .73) and requirement for postoperative parenteral analgesia (WMD, –.63; 95% CI, –1.22,–.04) were also significantly reduced. There was no difference between groups in the extent of oncological clearance.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery results in an earlier postoperative recovery and a resected specimen that is oncologically comparable to open surgery. Results from randomized trials reporting long-term outcomes such as cancer recurrence (local and metastatic) and 5-year survival are eagerly awaited.
Key Words: Laparoscopic • Rectal cancer • Curative resection • Comparative
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. A. Millett, S. A. Flores, G. Marks, J. B. Reed, and J. H. Herbst Circumcision Status and Risk of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Meta-analysis JAMA, October 8, 2008; 300(14): 1674 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Soop and H. Nelson Laparoscopic-Assisted Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: On Trial Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2357 - 2359. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. M. Ng, K. L. Leung, J. F. Y. Lee, R. Y. C. Yiu, J. C. M. Li, A. Y. B. Teoh, and W. W. Leung Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2418 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.-M. Boller and H. Nelson Colon and Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic or Open? Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6894s - 6896s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hellan, C. Anderson, J. D. I. Ellenhorn, B. Paz, and A. Pigazzi Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 14(11): 3168 - 3173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. L. Greene, K. W. Kercher, H. Nelson, C. M. Teigland, and A.-M. Boller Minimal Access Cancer Management CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 130 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Townell Quality of life after donor nephrectomy BMJ, July 29, 2006; 333(7561): 209 - 210. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
