| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 2PR, United Kingdom
2 Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
3 Clinical Sciences at South Bristol, University of Bristol, Level 7, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jane M. Blazeby, MD, FRCS; E-mail: j.m.blazeby{at}bristol.ac.uk.
Background: Outcomes for treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer traditionally include procedure-related morbidity and mortality and long-term survival. Patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction measures, add to standard end points, but associations between these factors are not fully understood. This study examined how patient satisfaction related to surgical morbidity, treatment type, and QOL outcomes after inpatient treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Methods: Consecutive patients who had completed treatment in one unit were invited to participate in this study and complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PATSAT32 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires within 2 months of discharge. Regression analyses examined relationships between satisfaction and surgical morbidity (major complications and type of treatment) and between satisfaction and QOL variables, adjusting for age and sex.
Results: During the study, 181 patients were treated, 162 were eligible, and 139 returned both questionnaires (response rate, 86%). Of the study sample, the treatment outcome was potential cure in 105 (67 esophagectomy and 38 D2 gastrectomy), and 34 received palliative treatment. Thirty-seven patients (27%) had major complications. Patients who received palliative treatment reported satisfaction and QOL scores similar to those of patients who received curative treatment. However, patients who experienced major morbidity reported significantly worse QOL than those without morbidity (P < .01). Satisfaction scores were the same in patients with or without complications. There were no associations between satisfaction and QOL scores (r < .34).
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with hospital care is independent of morbidity, treatment type, and QOL outcomes. It may be used to feed back information to providers of health care to improve patients’ experiences of treatment.
Key Words: Gastrointestinal neoplasms • Outcome assessment • Patient satisfaction • Quality of life
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Rutegard and P. Lagergren No Influence of Surgical Volume on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Resection Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2380 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
