| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Review |
1 Service dOncologie Médicale, Hôpital Tenon, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris Cedex 20, France
2 CancerEst, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France
3 GERCOR (Franch Oncology Research Group), 22 Rue Malher, 75004 Paris, France
4 Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
5 Vall dHebron University Hospital, P Vall dHebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
6 NSABP Foundation Research Program, 4 Allegheny Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212
7 IDDI, 430 Avenue Louise, BP 14, B 1050 Brussels, Belgium
8 Ospedale S. Martino, Largo Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy
9 Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
10 Arcispedale S. Maria Buova, Viale Resorgimento 80, Regio Emilia 42100, Italy
11 Hôpital Saint-Antoine, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Thierry André, MD, E-mail: thierry.andre{at}tnn.aphp.fr.
ABSTRACT
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid, combined with oxaliplatin, has now become an accepted standard of care for patients with stage III colon cancer. In contrast, the use of adjuvant therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and the identification of reliable prognostic factors to aid therapeutic decision making is crucial.
Methods: The authors critically review the results of clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of this population and the difficulty of performing clinical trials with sufficient power to reliably assess treatment efficacy. They also discuss the evidence concerning potential prognostic factors, particularly molecular markers.
Results: Available clinical trial data do not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for all stage II patients but suggest that it should be considered, particularly for certain high-risk patients. Recent guidelines advocate considering factors such as tumor differentiation, tumor perforation, number of lymph nodes examined, and T stage when assessing the likely benefit:risk ratio. Microsatellite instability and allelic imbalance seem to be strong predictors of good and poor prognosis, respectively, and in the near future, therapeutic decision-making models are likely to be further refined by the inclusion of such molecular markers.
Conclusions: There is growing evidence that the prognosis of certain stage II patients with unfavorable prognostic factors can be improved by adjuvant chemotherapy, and increasingly refined tools are now available to define those most likely to benefit. Referral of stage II patients for individual assessment is strongly recommended.
Key Words: Colon cancer, stage II Adjuvant chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil Leucovorin Oxaliplatin
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Ginty, S. Adak, A. Can, M. Gerdes, M. Larsen, H. Cline, R. Filkins, Z. Pang, Q. Li, and M. C. Montalto The Relative Distribution of Membranous and Cytoplasmic Met Is a Prognostic Indicator in Stage I and II Colon Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3814 - 3822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Compton Optimal Pathologic Staging: Defining Stage II Disease Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6862s - 6870s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Sargent, S. Patiyil, G. Yothers, D. G. Haller, R. Gray, J. Benedetti, M. Buyse, R. Labianca, J. F. Seitz, C. J. O'Callaghan, et al. End Points for Colon Cancer Adjuvant Trials: Observations and Recommendations Based on Individual Patient Data From 20,898 Patients Enrolled Onto 18 Randomized Trials From the ACCENT Group J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4569 - 4574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J A Morris, N. J Maughan, D. Forman, and P. Quirke Who to treat with adjuvant therapy in Dukes B/stage II colorectal cancer? The need for high quality pathology Gut, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Grossman, S. Lyle, M. B. Resnick, E. Sabo, R. T. Lis, E. Rosinha, Q. Liu, C.-C. Hsieh, G. Bhat, A. R. Frackelton Jr., et al. p66 Shc Tumor Levels Show a Strong Prognostic Correlation with Disease Outcome in Stage IIA Colon Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5798 - 5804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Andre, E. Quinaux, C. Louvet, P. Colin, E. Gamelin, O. Bouche, E. Achille, P. Piedbois, N. Tubiana-Mathieu, A. Boutan-Laroze, et al. Phase III Study Comparing a Semimonthly With a Monthly Regimen of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II and III Colon Cancer Patients: Final Results of GERCOR C96.1 J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3732 - 3738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |