This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, M. A. Articles by Roberts, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin, M. A. Articles by Roberts, S.

Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Mastectomy for Survival from Breast Cancer: the Western Australian Experience

School of Finance and Applied Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Michael A. Martin, BSc, PhD; E-mail: Michael.Martin{at}anu.edu.au

Background: The focus of this study was the relative survival rates of breast cancer patients whose treatment was breast-conserving surgery compared with that of mastectomy, adjusting for tumor size and nodal status because these factors may be intrinsically associated with mastectomy being the treatment of choice. Patient age was also accounted for in the model. By adjusting for these factors, we mitigate them as confounders of treatment choice in assessing effects on survival rates.

Methods: Data were sourced from linked administrative data from the Western Australian Department of Health Record Linkage Unit. The data consisted of linked records containing the diagnosis, subsequent hospital admission, and death records of about 3000 women diagnosed with cancer in Western Australia between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 1999. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate survival outcomes of breast-conserving surgery compared with that of mastectomy, adjusting for tumor size, nodal status, and subject age.

Results: The hazard of death is reduced by a factor of about one half for subjects whose treatment was breast-conserving surgery over treatment by mastectomy. Furthermore, the hazard of death increases substantially for subjects with nodal involvement over subjects for whom there has been no identified spread to regional lymph nodes. Hazard of death increases as both age and tumor size increase.

Conclusions: Western Australian breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery have improved survival outcomes over those treated with mastectomy, after allowing for tumor size, patient age, and lymph node involvement.

Key Words: Breast cancer • Breast-conserving surgery • Mastectomy • Record linkage • Survival analysis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Thompson, P. Baade, M. Coory, P. Carriere, and L. Fritschi Patterns of Surgical Treatment for Women Diagnosed with Early Breast Cancer in Queensland Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 443 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-D. Yu, G.-H. Di, J. Wu, J.-S. Lu, K.-W. Shen, Z.-Z. Shen, and Z.-M. Shao Development and trends of surgical modalities for breast cancer in china: a review of 16-year data. Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2502 - 2509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]