Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9542-1
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:3159-3167 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gold, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gold, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P. J.

Original Article

Utility of a Prognostic Nomogram Designed for Gastric Cancer in Predicting Outcome of Patients with R0 Resected Duodenal Adenocarcinoma

Jason S. Gold, MD1, Laura H. Tang, MD2, Mithat Gönen, PhD3, Daniel G. Coit, MD4, Murray F. Brennan, MD4 and Peter J. Allen, MD4

1 Department of Surgery, VA Boston Healthcare System/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
4 Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Peter J. Allen, MD; E-mail: allenp{at}mskcc.org

Background: There is little information to determine prognosis or to guide clinical care for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. We have hypothesized that survival following resection of duodenal cancer is similar to survival following resection of distal gastric cancer. We tested the utility of a nomogram created for determining disease-specific survival (DSS) after R0 resection of gastric cancer in estimating DSS for patients with resected duodenal cancer.

Methods: Review of a prospective database identified 106 patients who underwent R0 resection of duodenal cancer. Comparison was made to 459 patients with distal gastric cancer. The Student t test, Fisher exact test, Pearson chi-square test, and log-rank test were used to assess statistical significance. Concordance probabilities and calibration plots were used for nomogram validation.

Results: Duodenal cancers were more deeply invasive than gastric cancer (P < .01). The rate of lymph node positivity was not statistically different between the two tumors; however, there were differences in the rate of nodal positivity for certain depths of penetration. Younger age (P = .002), negative regional lymph nodes (P = .03), and tumors confined to the bowel wall or subserosa (P = .03) were associated with improved DSS for duodenal cancer. When applied to patients with duodenal cancer, the nomogram had a concordance probability of 0.70, and calibration appeared to be accurate.

Conclusions: A nomogram created for determining DSS after resection of gastric cancer predicts outcome for duodenal cancer patients and may prove to be useful for research and in guiding clinical care.

Key Words: Duodenal cancer • Gastric cancer • Nomogram • Survival • Prognosis • Surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. A. Grimes
The Nomogram Epidemic: Resurgence of a Medical Relic
Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2008; 149(4): 273 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.