This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kocak, E. Articles by Martin, E. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kocak, E. Articles by Martin, E. W., Jr.

Image Guidance during Abdominal Exploration for Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

¹ Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
² Department of Nuclear Medicine/PET, Kettering Memorial Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, USA
³ Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Edward W. Martin Jr., MD; 410 W. 10th Avenue, N911 Doan Hall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA; E-mail: edward.martin{at}osumc.edu

Background: Real-time intraoperative image guidance has been successfully applied to malignancies of the head, neck and central nervous system. Few attempts have been made to apply this technology to gastrointestinal cancers. Our purpose was to determine if a computer-assisted navigation system could be accurately used at the time of abdominal exploration.

Methods: Fourteen patients with resectable recurrent colorectal cancer underwent computer tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. The CT images were uploaded to a StealthStation (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), a device that tracks the motion of a handheld probe in the operating field and displays its position, in real time, on the uploaded images. Various anatomic points were utilized to match, or register, the patient to the images in the navigation system. After four or more anatomic points were registered, the accuracy of the registration process was computed by the navigation system and reported as the global error.

Results: A total of 23 different anatomic structures were used for registration. The median number of points used for registration per patient was 6.5 (range 5–9). The anatomic sites most commonly used were the anterior superior iliac spines, aortic bifurcation, sacral promontory, symphysis pubis, and iliac artery bifurcation. The median global error was 10.0 mm (range 6.7 mm–27.0 mm).

Conclusion: Computer-assisted navigation systems can be used to accurately deliver image guidance at the time of abdominal exploration. Future work will be directed at determining the value of this technology in the localization and resection of tumors.

Key Words: Image-guided surgery • Image guidance • Navigation • Colorectal cancer