Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-006-9228-0
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:526-532 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haller, F.
Right arrow Articles by Füzesi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haller, F.
Right arrow Articles by Füzesi, L.

Original Article

Surgical Management After Neoadjuvant Imatinib Therapy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) with Respect to Imatinib Resistance Caused by Secondary KIT Mutations

Florian Haller1, Sven Detken2, Hans-Jürgen Schulten1, Nicole Happel3, Bastian Gunawan1, Jens Kuhlgatz4 and László Füzesi1

1 Department of Pathology, Georg August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Göttingen, Germany
2 Department of Oncology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Northeim, Germany
3 Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
4 Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Northeim, Germany

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Florian Haller, MD; E-mail: florian.haller{at}med.uni-goettingen.de

Background: In metastasized GISTs, resistance to imatinib after initial tumour response has been associated with observation of secondary mutations in the activation loop of KIT. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the tumour response and observance of secondary KIT mutations in a case of GIST undergoing neoadjuvant imatinib therapy.

Methods: We report on a case of an initially unresectable gastric GIST with curative resection after 10 months of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy. Mutation analysis of KIT was performed on a pretherapeutic biopsy specimen, as well as on the resected tumour specimen.

Results: The pretherapeutic biopsy revealed cKit positive tumour cells with mutation of KIT exon 11 Del 560–576. The remaining tumour mass after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy almost exclusively consisted of hypocellular myxohyalinale stroma with rare microfoci of cKit positive tumour cells. Laser microdissection of several tumour microfoci revealed two additional point mutations located in the activation loop of KIT exon 17, C809G and N822Y, each observed separately in a distinct microfocus. Neither of these two point mutations has been reported in a GIST so far.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy successfully reduces tumour size in GISTs. Since resistance relevant secondary mutations of the activation loop of KIT may be observed after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy, the time elapse with preoperative imatinib therapy should be chosen as short as curative tumour resection or function sparing surgery can be carried out. The determination of the optimal time point for surgery is therefore a critical event and will be discussed.

Key Words: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour • GIST • Imatinib • KIT • Secondary resistance • Neoadjuvant therapy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.