Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
10.1245/s10434-006-9245-z
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:1099-1104 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G. A.

Original Article

Emergency Room Presentation of Colorectal Cancer: A Consecutive Cohort Study

Alex D. Mitchell, MD1, Karen M. Inglis, RN1, John M. Murdoch, MD, FRCSC, FACS2 and Geoffrey A. Porter, MD, FRCSC, FACS1

1 Division of General Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
2 Department of Surgery, Dartmouth General Hospital, Dartmouth, NS, Canada

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Alex D. Mitchell, MD; Room 7017 Victoria Building, QE II Health Sciences Centre, 1278 Tower Road, B3H 2Y9, Halifax, NS, Canada; E-mail: admitche{at}dal.ca

Background: Emergency room presentation (ERP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with worse cancer-related outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of ERP and identify factors associated with ERP of CRC.

Methods: We performed a prospective consecutive cohort study of all patients undergoing resection for CRC from 02/2002 to 02/2004. Standardized data collection involved hospital record review, patient interview, and prospective follow-up. ERP was defined as the diagnosis and/or surgical treatment of CRC as a result of presentation to the emergency department.

Results: Of the 455 patients in the study 108 (24%) had ERP. Presentation of those with ERP was obstruction in 46 (43%), bleeding/anemia in 35 (32%), pain in 25 (23%), and other (2%). The ERP cohort was older (mean age 70.8 vs. 67.0 years, P = 0.005). ERP was more common amongst females (29.7 vs. 18.2%, P = 0.004) and obesity appears to be associated with increased rates of ERP. ERP of CRC was associated with more advanced TNM stage. The ERP cohort had longer length of stay in hospital (median 10 vs. 8 days respectively, P < 0.001). Peri-operative mortality was higher in ERP patients (7.4 vs. 2.3%, P = 0.03).

Conclusions: ERP in CRC was not infrequent and appeared to be associated with female gender and weight. The known negative prognostic impact of ERP, combined with the increased peri-operative mortality and length of stay, would suggest a potential benefit to targeted strategies aimed at reducing the use of the emergency room in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Key Words: Colorectal cancer • Obstruction • Perforation • Emergency • Gender • Obesity






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.