| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
1 Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude HuriezCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
2 University of Lille II, Lille, France
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Christophe Mariette; E-mail: c-mariette{at}chru-lille.fr
Background: In patients who are nonresponders to primary radiochemotherapy (RCT), prognosis is poor, leading mostly to palliation. Salvage surgery may have a survival benefit otherwise complete. Our aim was to identify predictors of R0 resection in these patients.
Methods: In 98 nonresponders with locally advanced infracarinal tumors, curative salvage surgery was attempted. Resection was R0 in 62.2% and incomplete in 37.8% of cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses included pre-RCT and post-RCT variables collected prospectively.
Results: Overall survival was higher in the R0 resection group (18.4 vs 8.6 months, P < .001). Independent predictors of R0 resection were tumor height
5 cm on barium swallow (P = .045) and aortic contact
90° on computed tomography (P = .039) evaluated after RCT. Three groups of patients were constructed: 1, tumor height
5 cm with aortic contact
90° (n = 43); 2, tumor height between 6 and 10 cm with aortic contact
90° (n = 32); and 3, aortic contact > 90°, irrespective of tumor height (n = 23). Rates of R0 resection were 81%, 53%, and 39%, respectively (P = .001).
Conclusion: Salvage esophagectomy should be systematically attempted in nonresponders with tumor height
5 cm on barium swallow and aortic contact
90° on computed tomography and discussed case by case for other patients.
Key Words: Esophageal carcinoma Treatment Radiochemotherapy Salvage surgery
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-B. D'Journo, P. Michelet, L. Dahan, C. Doddoli, J.-F. Seitz, R. Giudicelli, P. A. Fuentes, and P. A. Thomas Indications and outcome of salvage surgery for oesophageal cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1117 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |