Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9405-9
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:2036-2044 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piessen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mariette, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piessen, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mariette, C.

Original Article

Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma Nonresponder to Radiochemotherapy: Who Will Benefit From Surgery?

Guillaume Piessen1, Nicolas Briez1, Jean-Pierre Triboulet1,2 and Christophe Mariette1,2

1 Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez—Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
2 University of Lille II, Lille, France

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Christophe Mariette; E-mail: c-mariette{at}chru-lille.fr

Background: In patients who are nonresponders to primary radiochemotherapy (RCT), prognosis is poor, leading mostly to palliation. Salvage surgery may have a survival benefit otherwise complete. Our aim was to identify predictors of R0 resection in these patients.

Methods: In 98 nonresponders with locally advanced infracarinal tumors, curative salvage surgery was attempted. Resection was R0 in 62.2% and incomplete in 37.8% of cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses included pre-RCT and post-RCT variables collected prospectively.

Results: Overall survival was higher in the R0 resection group (18.4 vs 8.6 months, P < .001). Independent predictors of R0 resection were tumor height ≤ 5 cm on barium swallow (P = .045) and aortic contact ≤ 90° on computed tomography (P = .039) evaluated after RCT. Three groups of patients were constructed: 1, tumor height ≤ 5 cm with aortic contact ≤ 90° (n = 43); 2, tumor height between 6 and 10 cm with aortic contact ≤ 90° (n = 32); and 3, aortic contact > 90°, irrespective of tumor height (n = 23). Rates of R0 resection were 81%, 53%, and 39%, respectively (P = .001).

Conclusion: Salvage esophagectomy should be systematically attempted in nonresponders with tumor height ≤ 5 cm on barium swallow and aortic contact ≤ 90° on computed tomography and discussed case by case for other patients.

Key Words: Esophageal carcinoma • Treatment • Radiochemotherapy • Salvage surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
X.-B. D'Journo, P. Michelet, L. Dahan, C. Doddoli, J.-F. Seitz, R. Giudicelli, P. A. Fuentes, and P. A. Thomas
Indications and outcome of salvage surgery for oesophageal cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1117 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.