Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
10.1245/s10434-007-9402-z
Annals of Surgical Oncology 14:2056-2068 (2007)
© 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornish, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tekkis, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornish, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tekkis, P. P.

Original Article

A Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life for Abdominoperineal Excision of Rectum versus Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Julie A. Cornish, MBBCh, MRCS1, Henry S. Tilney, MBBS, MRCS1, Alexander G. Heriot, MD, FRCS2, Ian C. Lavery, MD3, Victor W. Fazio, MD3 and Paris P. Tekkis, MD, FRCS1,3

1 Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
3 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paris P. Tekkis, MD, FRCS; E-mail: p.tekkis{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Avoiding a permanent stoma following rectal cancer excision is believed to improve quality of life (QoL), but evidence from comparative studies is contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare QoL following abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER) with that after anterior resection (AR) in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods: A literature search was performed to identify studies published between 1966 and 2006 comparing values of QoL following APER and AR. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to combine the data. Sensitivity analyses were performed for larger studies, those of higher quality and those using self-administered QoL questionnaires.

Results: The outcomes for 1,443 patients from 11 studies, of whom 486 (33%) underwent APER, were included. QoL assessments were made at periods of up to 2 years following surgery. There was no significant difference in global health scores between APER and AR. Vitality (WMD –9.82; 95% CI –27.01, –2.04, P = 0.01) and sexual function (WMD –2.73; 95% CI –4.93, –0.64, P = 0.01) were improved in the AR patients. Patients with low AR had improved physical function scores in comparison with APER patients (WMD –4.67; 95% CI –9.10, –0.23; P = 0.004). Cognitive (WMD 3.57; 95% CI 1.41, 5.73; P < 0.001) and emotional function scores (WMD 3.51; 95% CI 1.40, 5.62; P < 0.001) were higher for APER patients.

Conclusion: Overall, when comparing APER with AR, we identified no differences in general QoL following the procedures. Individualisation of care for rectal cancer patients is essential, but a policy of avoidance of APER cannot currently be justified on the grounds of QoL alone.

Key Words: Quality of life • Anterior resection • Abdominoperineal resection • Meta-analysis • Rectal cancer






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.