Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9587-1
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:165-174 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slidell, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pawlik, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slidell, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pawlik, T. M.

Original Article

Impact of Total Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Ratio on Staging and Survival after Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Large, Population-Based Analysis

Mark B. Slidell, MD, MPH1, David C. Chang, MPH, MBA2, John L. Cameron, MD2, Christopher Wolfgang, MD, PhD2, Joseph M. Herman, MD, MSc3, Richard D. Schulick, MD2, Michael A. Choti, MD, MBA2 and Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH2

1 Department of Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
2 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
3 Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH; E-mail: tpawlik1{at}jhmi.edu

Background: Based on data from other malignancies, the number of lymph nodes evaluated and the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes (LNR) may be important predictors of survival. LNR has never been investigated in a large population-based study of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 4005 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1988 to 2003. The effect of total lymph node count and LNR on survival was examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: The median number of lymph nodes examined was seven; 390 (10.1%) patients had no lymph nodes examined. Of those patients who had at least one lymph node examined, 1507 (43.3%) had no lymph node metastases (N0) and 1971 (56.7%) had metastatic nodal disease (N1). Overall median survival was 13 months, and 5-year survival was 6.8%. N1 disease was associated with a worse 5-year survival compared with N0 disease (4.3 vs 11.3%, respectively, P < .001). Patients with N0 disease could be further stratified based on the number of lymph nodes evaluated (median survival: 1–11 nodes, 16 months vs 12 or more nodes, 23 months; P < .001). For N1 patients, LNR was one of the most powerful factors associated with survival (LNR > 0–0.2, 15 months; LNR > 0.2–0.4, 12 months; LNR > 0.4, 10 months) (P < .001).

Conclusions: Most patients have an inadequate number of lymph nodes evaluated following pancreatic surgery. N0 patients who have fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined may be understaged. In patients with N1 disease, LNR may better substratify patients with regard to prognosis.

Key Words: Pancreatic cancer • Lymph node ratio • Staging • Outcomes • SEER




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. S. Park, I. G. Do, C. K. Park, W. K. Kang, J. H. Noh, T. S. Sohn, S. Kim, M.-J. Kim, and K.-M. Kim
Cyclooxygenase-2 Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Gastric Carcinoma Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Is Not Associated with EBV Infection
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 291 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. Peng, Y. Xu, Z. Guan, J. Zhu, M. Wang, G. Cai, W. Sheng, and S. Cai
Prognostic Significance of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Node-Positive Rectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 15(11): 3118 - 3123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.