This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arora, N. Articles by Simmons, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arora, N. Articles by Simmons, R. M.

Sentinel Node Positivity Rates With and Without Frozen Section for Breast Cancer

¹ Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E. 68th St., New York, NY 10065, USA
² Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E. 68th St., New York NY 10065, USA
³ Department of Pathology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E. 68th St., New York, NY 10065, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Rache M. Simmons, MD; E-mail: rms2002{at}med.cornell.edu

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to detect breast cancer axillary metastases. Some surgeons send the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for intraoperative frozen section (FS) to minimize delayed axillary dissections. There has been concern that FS may discard nodal tissue and thus underdiagnose small metastases. This study examines whether evaluation of SLN by FS increases the false-negative rate of SLNB.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of SLNB from 659 patients was conducted to determine the frequency of node positivity among SLNB subjected to both FS and permanent section (PS) versus PS alone. Statistical analysis was performed by the ² square test, and a logistic regression model was applied to estimate the effect of final node positivity between the two groups.

Results: FS was performed in 327 patients and PS was performed in all 659 patients. Among patients undergoing both FS and PS (n = 327), the final node positivity rate was 33.0% compared with 19.6% among patients undergoing PS alone (n = 332). After adjustment for patient age, tumor diameter, grade, and hormone receptor status in a multivariate logistic regression model, there remained an increased likelihood of final node positivity for patients undergoing both procedures relative to PS alone (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–3.6; P = .005).

Conclusions: There was a higher rate of SLN positivity in specimens evaluated by both FS and PS. Therefore, evaluating SLN by FS does not underdiagnose small metastases nor produce a higher false-negative rate. Intraoperative FS offers the advantage of less delayed axillary dissections.

Key Words: Sentinel lymph node • Frozen section • False negative • Breast cancer