Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9670-7
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:472-477 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reimer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gerber, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reimer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gerber, B.

Original Article

How Important is the Axillary Nodal Status for Adjuvant Treatment Decisions at a Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Tumor Board? A Survival Analysis

Toralf Reimer, MD1, Rainer Fietkau, PhD2, Susanne Markmann, MD3, Angrit Stachs, MD1 and Bernd Gerber, PhD1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, 18059, Rostock, Germany
2 Department of Radiotherapy, University of Rostock, Suedring 75, 18059, Rostock, Germany
3 Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Suedstadt, Suedring 81, 18059, Rostock, Germany

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Toralf Reimer, MD; E-mail: toralf.reimer{at}med.uni-rostock.de

Background: Tumor board recommendations for breast cancer are mainly based on patient characteristics and prognostic tumor parameters. In the era of potential avoidance of axillary surgery we evaluate the impact of pathologic nodal status for adjuvant treatment decisions.

Methods: Postoperative tumor board records of 207 patients over a 1-year period were rediscussed without knowledge of pathologic nodal status. Differences were classified as major (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: present/absent) or minor (different chemotherapeutic protocols) discrepancies. The survival rates among subgroups were calculated using Adjuvant! Online tool.

Results: The tumor board without information of pathologic nodal status resulted in treatment changes in 72 of the 207 patients studied (34.8%). Major discrepancies were observed in 37 patients (17.9%). The survival rates were not significantly different due to a balanced overtreatment and undertreatment in this subgroup. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was an independent parameter used to predict the subgroup with major discrepancies (P = .001; RR = 4.9 [95% CI, 1.9–12.7]).

Conclusions: The knowledge of pathologic nodal status is important for postoperative chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiotherapy indications. There is a risk for one-third of all patients when avoiding axillary surgery to get an adjuvant therapy that differs from the current guidelines especially in carcinomas with present LVI.

Key Words: Axillary dissection • Breast cancer • Chemotherapy • Radiotherapy • Survival • Tumor board







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.