Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9701-4
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:754-763 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gusani, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, D. L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gusani, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, D. L.

Original Article

Aggressive Surgical Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis With Low Mortality in a High-Volume Tertiary Cancer Center

Niraj J. Gusani, MD1, Sung W. Cho, MD1, Christos Colovos, MD, PhD1, Songwon Seo, MS2, Jan Franko, MD, PhD1, Scott D. Richard, MD3, Robert P. Edwards, MD3, Charles K. Brown, MD, PhD1, Matthew P. Holtzman, MD1, Herbert J. Zeh, MD1 and David L. Bartlett, MD1

1 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
2 Consulting Statistician, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
3 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Niraj J. Gusani, MD; E-mail: ngusani{at}psu.edu

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) traditionally involves high perioperative morbidity and mortality. We report our experience performing CS-HIPEC in a high-volume regional perfusion program designed to limit morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A total of 122 patients underwent 124 CS-HIPEC procedures. Common tumors treated with CS-HIPEC included appendiceal (38.5%), colorectal (24.6%), and ovarian cancers (13.1%), and peritoneal mesothelioma (12.3%). Complete cytoreduction was performed in all patients, with organ resections performed as necessary.

Results: R0 resection was achieved in 28.7% of cases, R1 in 54.9%, and R2 in 16.4%. Median operative time was 460 minutes (range, 250–840 minutes), and median blood loss was 1150 mL (range, 10–14,000 mL). Median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 12 days (range, 6–50 days) and 3 days (range, 0–41 days), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 morbidity by National Cancer Institute criteria (major morbidity) was seen in 29.8% of cases, with overall morbidity 56.5%. Independent prognostic variables for major morbidity included number of anastomoses and degree of cytoreduction. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 0% and 1.6%, respectively. The most favorable diagnosis was appendiceal cancer, for which 2-year survival was 66.7%, with lower-grade histologic subtypes of appendiceal cancer reaching 85.7% 2-year survival. Colorectal cancer had 2-year survival of 36.7%.

Conclusions: In a high-volume center with extensive experience treating peritoneal malignancies, perioperative mortality can be lowered to nearly zero, although morbidity remains high. CS-HIPEC procedures should be studied further in a controlled manner to help define their important role in the care of patients with PC.

Key Words: Peritoneal carcinomatosis • Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy • Colorectal cancer • Appendiceal cancer • Ovarian cancer • Peritoneal mesothelioma







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.