Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9804-y
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:1267-1270 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, D. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, D. C.

Original Article

Does Practice Make Perfect?

A. M. Hogan and D. C. Winter1

Institute of Clinical Outcomes in Research and Education (ICORE), St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: D. C. Winter; E-mail: WinterD{at}indigo.ie

Extensive literature supports the correlation between surgical volume and improved clinical outcome in the management of various cancers. It is this evidence that has catalysed the creation of centres of excellence. However, on closer inspection, many of these studies are poor quality, low weight and use vastly heterogenous end points in assessment of both volume and outcome. We critically appraise the English language literature published over the last ten years pertaining to the volume outcome relationship in the context of cancer care. Future balanced unbiased studies may enable equipoise in planning international cancer management strategies.

Key Words: Cancer • Volume • Outcome







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.