Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-007-9720-1
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:1304-1308 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Intra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Veronesi, U.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Intra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Veronesi, U.

Original Article

When Sentinel Lymph Node is Intramammary

Mattia Intra, MD1, Carlos A. Garcia-Etienne, MD1, Giuseppe Renne, MD2, Giuseppe Trifirò, MD3, Nicole Rotmensz, MSc4, Oreste D. Gentilini, MD1, Viviana Galimberti, MD1, Andrea Sagona, MD1, Denise Mattar, MD1, Claudia Sangalli, DSc1, Giovanna Gatti, MD1, Alberto Luini, MD1 and Umberto Veronesi, MD1

1 Breast Surgery Department, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, MI 20141, Italy
2 Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
3 Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
4 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mattia Intra, MD; E-mail: mattia.intra{at}ieo.it

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an accepted standard of care for staging the axilla in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Little attention has been placed to the presence of intramammary sentinel lymph nodes (intraMSLNs) on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy.

Methods: Between December 2001 and September 2006, in 9632 breast cancer patients with clinically uninvolved axillary nodes, lymphoscintigraphy was performed at the European Institute of Oncology (EIO). An axillary SLN (axSLN) was identified in 99.4% of cases. An intraMSLN was identified in association with the axillary sentinel lymph node in 22 patients (0.2%). In 15 cases both the axSLN and the intraMSLN were excised.

Results: The intraMSLN was positive in six patients (micrometastatic in three cases). The axSLNs were negative in all 15 cases. Two patients with positive intraMSLNs and one patient with a negative intraMSLN underwent axillary dissection; all three cases had negative axillary nodes. At a median follow-up of 24 months, no locoregional or systemic recurrences were observed.

Conclusions: Positive intraMSLNs can improve disease staging but do not necessarily portend axillary lymph node metastasis. When intraMSLNs and axSLNs are present, we advocate biopsy of both sites and that management of the axilla should rely on axSLN status. In cases with intraMSLNs as the only draining site on lymphoscintigraphy, decisions on axillary management should be made on individualized basis.

Key Words: Breast cancer • Sentinel lymph node biopsy • Intramammary sentinel lymph node biopsy • Intramammary lymph nodes • Extra-axillary sentinel node biopsy • Extra-axillary nodes







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.