Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
10.1245/s10434-008-9847-8
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:1492-1501 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riber-Hansen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Steiniche, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Riber-Hansen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Steiniche, T.

Original Article

Extensive Pathological Analysis of Selected Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Nodes: High Metastasis Detection Rates at Reduced Workload

Rikke Riber-Hansen, MD1, Pia Sjoegren, MD2, Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit, MD, FRCPath1 and Torben Steiniche, MD, DMSc3

1 Institute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
3 Department of Pathology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Rikke Riber-Hansen, MD; E-mail: rrhan{at}as.aaa.dk

Background: Extensive pathological workup of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in melanoma detects more patients with metastasis-positive SLNs than do routine protocols, but at the cost of high laboratory workloads. We aimed to design a protocol that reduced this workload without compromising metastasis detection.

Methods: We analyzed 920 SLNs from 321 consecutive patients with melanoma by complete step sectioning and immunohistochemistry. We designed different models to theoretically reduce the number of histological sections examined and compared the results from these simulations with results obtained with our extended protocol, with the restricted national Danish protocol, and with the protocol recommended by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

Results: The extended protocol increased the metastasis detection rate by 22% (95% confidence interval, 11–34; 30.8% vs. 25.2%, P < .0001) compared with the national Danish protocol, and it had a similar rate to that reported by the EORTC (30.8% vs. 29.4%, P = .6229). The workload associated with complete step sectioning could be reduced by 40% by focusing step sectioning on the SLNs with the highest gamma counts, while examining SLNs with lower gamma counts with one to three central sections. The false-negative rate for detecting metastases with this reduced protocol was 6% compared with complete step sectioning.

Conclusions: Combining complete step sectioning of SLNs with immunohistochemistry ensures high metastasis detection rates. Workloads can be markedly reduced with only a slight increase in the false-negative rate by focusing analysis on the SLNs most likely to contain metastases, i.e., those with the highest gamma counts.

Key Words: Gamma counts • Immunohistochemistry • Melanoma • Neoplasm metastasis • Pathology • Sentinel lymph node biopsy






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.