This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Esposito, I. Articles by Büchler, M. W. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Esposito, I. Articles by Büchler, M. W.

Most Pancreatic Cancer Resections are R1 Resections

¹ Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
² Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Irene Esposito, MD; E-mail: Esposito{at}lrz.tum.de

Background: Curative resection has been shown to be one of the key factors influencing survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Although general guidelines for the processing of pancreatic specimens have been established, there is currently no widely accepted standardized protocol for pathological examination, especially with respect to resection margins.

Methods: Here we present a single-center experience with 111 consecutive macroscopic complete pancreatic head resections for PDAC carried out between 2005 and 2006 by using standardized pathological processing and reporting. The pancreatic transection margin, as well as the bile duct and stomach/duodenum margins and the circumferential soft tissue margins (medial, anterior surface, superior, and posterior), were inked and analyzed. R1 was defined as a distance of the tumor from the resection margin of 1 mm.

Results: One hundred eighty-eight consecutive macroscopic complete pancreatic head resections carried out for PDAC without a standardized protocol between 2002 and 2004 were used as a control group. The R1 rate for resections carried out with the standardized protocol was 76%. The medial (68%) and the posterior (47%) margins were most commonly involved, and in 32% of the cases, more than one margin was affected. The R1 resection rate in the period without standardized pathological reporting was 14%.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of pathological reporting and suggests that tumor growth patterns and thorough examination but not surgical technique determine R1 resection rates in PDAC.

Key Words: Pancreatic cancer • Margins • Local recurrence • Survival • Pathology reporting

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Kleeff and H. Friess Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Many Trials, Little Progress J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2008; 26(18): 3100 - 3100. [Full Text] [PDF]