Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-008-9915-0
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:2034-2041 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Coit, D. G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Coit, D. G.

Original Article

A Single-Institution Validation of the AJCC Staging System for Stage IV Melanoma

Heather B. Neuman, MD1, Ami Patel, BA1, Nicole Ishill, MS2, Christine Hanlon, BS1, Mary Sue Brady, MD1, Allan C. Halpern, MD3, Alan Houghton, MD3 and Daniel G. Coit, MD1

1 Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Room H1221, New York, NY 10065, USA
2 Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
3 Department Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Daniel G. Coit, MD; E-mail: coitd{at}mskcc.org

Background: Survival of patients with stage IV melanoma is poor. In the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, site of distant disease and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are the only prognostic factors included for stage IV disease. We sought to validate the current AJCC staging system in a contemporary, prospectively collected cohort of patients and explore additional factors that may influence prognosis.

Methods: Our prospective database was searched to identify patients with stage IV melanoma; only patients seen at our institution before developing stage IV disease were included (n = 589). Demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics were abstracted. Univariate and multivariate assessment of prognostic factors associated with survival were performed by Cox regression.

Results: Overall median survival was 9 months. Differential survival by AJCC substage was observed (P < .001). For each site of disease described within the AJCC staging system, an abnormal LDH level was associated with a poorer prognosis. By multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis (as a continuous variable, hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]) 1.01–1.02), an abnormal LDH (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11–1.82), site of disease (lung HR 1.22, 95% CI .89–1.66; other viscera 1.61, 95% CI 1.18–2.21), more than one organ involvement (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01–1.60), and more than one metastasis (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.65–3.14) were independently associated with poorer survival. Sex, antecedent stage, and disease-free interval were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: In our patient cohort, the AJCC staging system was valid. The strongest predictor of survival—the number of metastases present at the diagnosis of stage IV disease—represents a variable to consider in future staging systems.

Key Words: Staging • Stage IV melanoma • Metastases • Survival







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.