Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-008-9932-z
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:2113-2119 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yubin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chaomin, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yubin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chaomin, L.

Original Article

Surgical Management and Prognostic Factors of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Experience with 115 Cases in China

Liu Yubin, PhD1, Fang Chihua, PhD2, Jian Zhixiang, MM1, Ou Jinrui, BA1, Liu Zixian, BA1, Zheng Jianghua, BA1, Lin Ye, MD1, Jin Haosheng, MD1 and Lu Chaomin, PhD2

1 Hepatobiliary Department, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, No. 106, Zhongshan 2 Road, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
2 Hepatobiliary Department, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jian Zhixiang, MM; E-mail: liu_yubin{at}126.com

Background: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (or Klatskin tumor) is a rare condition, accounting for less than 1% of all cancers. This study was designed to assess the surgical and postsurgical management of affected patients, including the postoperative chemotherapy, and an analysis to determine prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Methods: A retrospective review of 115 consecutive cases treated with resection between January 1990 and January 2004 at a single university medical center in southern China was carried out. Clinicopathological data were analyzed and univariate and multivariate analyses against outcome was employed to determine the prognostic significance of a variety of factors including excision margin characteristics, status of metastases, tumor type, histological differentiation, lymph node characteristics, and postoperative therapy.

Results: Median survival time of patients treated with resection and anastomosis with postoperative chemotherapy was 41 months compared with 36 months for patients who did not receive chemotherapy postoperatively. Factors correlating with shorter survival were positive excision margin, metastasis, adenoacanthoma-type tumor, poor or unknown histological differentiation, and positive lymph nodes. In addition, postoperative chemotherapy improved survival. Patients treated with chemotherapy postoperatively had a survival of 43.15±21.02 months, which was significantly longer than the survival of patients who received no postoperatively chemotherapy (36.97±15.99 months; P<0.05).

Conclusion: Resection with anastomosis and postoperative chemotherapy results in longer survival time compared with no chemotherapy postoperatively. Positive excision margins, metastases, adenoacanthoma-type tumor, poor or unknown histological differentiation, and positive lymph nodes correlate with shorter survival.

Key Words: Bile duct cancer • Long time survival • Prognostic factors







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.