Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-008-9985-z
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:2206-2214 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalal, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coit, D. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalal, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Coit, D. G.

Original Article

Methods of Detection of First Recurrence in Patients with Stage I/II Primary Cutaneous Melanoma After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Kimberly Moore Dalal, MD1,2,3, Qin Zhou, MA4, Katherine S. Panageas, DrPH4, Mary S. Brady, MD3, David P. Jaques, MD3,5 and Daniel G. Coit, MD3

1 Department of Surgery, David Grant United States Air Force Medical Center, Travis AFB, CA, USA
2 Department of Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, CA, USA
3 Department of Surgery, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA
4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
5 Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Daniel G. Coit, MD; E-mail: coitd{at}mskcc.org

Background: An understanding of the methods of detection of recurrent melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is essential for the coordination of a rational plan of follow-up.

Methods: Clinical stage I/II melanoma patients who underwent SLNB from 1991 to 2004 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-institution database. Detection of recurrence by self (awareness of symptoms or abnormal physical findings) or physician (discovered on routine physical or scheduled test) and timing of clinic visit were recorded. Postoperative follow-up included physical exam every 3–4 months for the first year, every 3–6 months for the second year, and every 6–12 months thereafter. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and chest X-ray (CXR) were obtained annually. Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) were performed selectively.

Results: Of 1062 patients who underwent SLNB, 203 (19%) experienced 230 initial sites of recurrence; 198 patients were evaluable for follow-up. Median follow-up after first recurrence was 17 months. Symptoms and self-detected physical findings were present in 109 patients (55%); 85 patients (78%) were seen earlier than their scheduled visit. Self-detected physical findings identified in-transit (n = 26; 24%) and nodal (n = 25; 23%) disease. Physician detection occurred in 89 patients (45%), nearly half by a scheduled radiographic test (CXR, 16%; CT, 29%; PET, 1%). The method of detection significantly predicted post-recurrence survival (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: More than half of melanoma recurrences are self-detected; these patients have the most favorable post-recurrence survival rates because of the type of recurrence detected. The mode of detection is a significant predictor of post-recurrence survival. This supports an aggressive program of patient education in self-examination after SLNB for melanoma.

Key Words: Melanoma • Recurrence • Detection • Patient education







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.