Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.1245/s10434-008-0051-7
Annals of Surgical Oncology 15:2519-2525 (2008)
© 2008 Society of Surgical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellsworth, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shriver, C. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellsworth, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shriver, C. D.

Original Article

Chromosomal Alterations Associated with the Transition from In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer

Rachel E. Ellsworth, PhD1,2, Amy Vertrees, MD3, Brad Love, PhD4, Jeffrey A. Hooke, MD3, Darrell L. Ellsworth, PhD2 and Craig D. Shriver, MD3

1 Clinical Breast Care Project, Henry M. Jakcon Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, 620 Seventh Street, Windber, PA 15963, USA
2 Clinical Breast Care Project, Windber Research Institute, 620 Seventh Street, Windber, PA 15963, USA
3 Clinical Breast Care Project, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 6900 Georgia Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20307, USA
4 Invitrogen, 1600 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Rachel E. Ellsworth, PhD; E-mail: r.ellsworth{at}wriwindber.org

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive lesion of the breast with an inherent but nonobligatory tendency for progression to invasive breast cancer. Although the transition from in situ to invasive disease is critical to the development of breast cancer, molecular and biological changes responsible for this transition are not well characterized.

Methods: Chromosomal alterations at 26 regions were assayed in 66 DCIS lesions and 111 invasive ductal carcinomas. Levels and patterns of allelic imbalance (AI) were compared between grade 1 DCIS and well-differentiated breast carcinomas, and between grade 3 DCIS and poorly differentiated invasive breast carcinomas, using Fisher’s exact and Student’s t-tests.

Results: Levels of AI were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in grade 1 DCIS (11.9%) compared to well-differentiated carcinomas (19.2%), but were not significantly different between grade 3 DCIS and poorly differentiated tumors. No significant differences were detected at any of the 26 chromosomal regions between low-grade DCIS and invasive tumors; however, AI events at chromosomes 1p36, 11q23, and 16q11–q22 could discriminate high-grade in situ from invasive disease.

Conclusion: Lower levels of AI in low-grade in situ compared with invasive disease may reflect the protracted time to progression associated with low-grade DCIS. Increased levels of AI at chromosomes 1p36 and 11q23 in poorly differentiated carcinomas may harbor genes associated with invasiveness, while loss of chromosome 16q11–q22 may prevent the transition from in situ to invasive disease. Further characterization of these changes may provide molecular assays to identify DCIS lesions with invasive potential as well as targets for molecular therapeutics.

Key Words: DCIS • Invasive breast cancer • Allelic imbalance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.