Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 2, Issue 3 275-280, Copyright © 1995 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability

R. S. Foster Jr, M. E. Farwell and M. C. Costanza
Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, USA.

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that one of the rewards of breast cancer screening is the increased likelihood of receiving breast-conserving surgery. The recent wide application of screening mammography has led to an acceleration in the otherwise gradual shift toward smaller, earlier-stage breast cancer that has been occurring since the turn of the century. METHODS: We examined data from patients with pathologically diagnosed breast cancers from all general hospitals in the state of Vermont for use of breast-conserving surgery by era (1975-1984 [n = 1,652] versus 1989-1990 [n = 683]), method of cancer detection, age, clinical tumor-node-metastases (cTNM) stage, pathologic size, and node status. RESULTS: Cancers detected by mammography were 2% in 1975-1984 and 36% in 1989-1990. Invasive breast cancers < 2 cm maximum pathologic diameter were 34% in 1975-1984 and 50% in 1989-1990 (p < 0.001). Statewide, the use of breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer increased from 8.6% in 1975-1984 to 42.9% in 1989-1990 (p < 0.001). In 1989-1990 at the single university hospital, 73% of the patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery versus 22% at the community hospitals (range 0-39%, p < 0.001). Differential referral patterns related to stage and age did not appear to explain the variation, because the percentages of cTNM stage I and II patients at the university hospital were similar to those of the community hospitals. Using the university hospital as the standard, we estimated that at least 67% of all patients in the state were eligible for breast-conserving surgery in the years 1975-1984 and 73% in the years 1975-1984, a 6% increase. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the variation in breast-conserving surgery was related to factors other than patient age and stage of disease. Variation was probably related more to local community factors and physician attitudes. At least two-thirds of the women in the state were eligible for breast-conserving surgery even before the wide use of mammography screening.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Katz, T. P. Hofer, S. Hawley, P. M. Lantz, N. K. Janz, K. Schwartz, L. Liu, D. Deapen, and M. Morrow Patterns and Correlates of Patient Referral to Surgeons for Treatment of Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2007; 25(3): 271 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Foster Jr Breast Cancer Detection and Treatment: A Personal and Historical Perspective Arch Surg, April 1, 2003; 138(4): 397 - 408. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2003 CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2003; 53(1): 27 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. I. Gregorio, M. Kulldorff, L. Barry, H. Samocuik, and K. Zarfos Geographical Differences in Primary Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 844 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Morrow, J. White, J. Moughan, J. Owen, T. Pajack, J. Sylvester, J. Frank Wilson, and D. Winchester Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2001; 19(8): 2254 - 2262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hebert-Croteau, J. Brisson, J. Latreille, C. Blanchette, and L. Deschenes Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994 Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 1999; 161(8): 951 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Secker-Walker, P. M. Vacek, G. J. Hooper, D. A. Plante, and A. S. Detsky Screening for Breast Cancer: Time, Travel, and Out-of-Pocket Expenses J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 1999; 91(8): 702 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Foster Jr and W. C. Wood Alternative Strategies in the Management of Primary Breast Cancer Arch Surg, November 1, 1998; 133(11): 1182 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]