Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seidmon, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seidmon, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, A. B.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 2, Issue 6 550-556, Copyright © 1995 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Phase I/II dose-escalation study of liarozole in patients with stage D, hormone-refractory carcinoma of the prostate

E. J. Seidmon, D. L. Trump, W. Kreis, S. W. Hall, M. R. Kurman, S. P. Ouyang, J. Wu and A. B. Kremer
Department of Urology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.

BACKGROUND: Liarozole binds to the cytochrome P-450-dependent hydroxylating enzymes involved in steroid biosynthesis and retinoic acid catabolism. This phase I study investigated the clinical/endocrine toxicity profile of liarozole and determined the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Groups of five patients were treated with oral liarozole caplets, starting at 37.5 mg twice daily. The dose was doubled for each subsequent group until the MTD was reached, after which, an additional 18 patients were entered into the MTD-1 dose stratum. The long-term safety of liarozole was assessed based on treatment-emergent signs and symptoms and clinically significant laboratory results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg twice daily. Side effects that defined the MTD included lethargy, somnolence, body rash, and paresthesias. Two deaths occurred during the trial (pneumonia and myocardial infarction). Four patients had a > 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (two at 150 mg, two at 300 mg). Of nine patients with measurable disease, two had partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: Liarozole was generally well tolerated with no evidence of adrenal insufficiency. Preliminary evidence of activity in this indication was observed based on dose-dependent decreases in PSA levels and improvement in soft-tissue metastasis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. H. Ly, X.-Y. Zhao, L. Holloway, and D. Feldman
Liarozole Acts Synergistically with 1{alpha},25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 to Inhibit Growth of DU 145 Human Prostate Cancer Cells by Blocking 24-Hydroxylase Activity
Endocrinology, May 1, 1999; 140(5): 2071 - 2076.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. J. Russell, S. Bennett, and P. Stricker
Growth factor involvement in progression of prostate cancer
Clin. Chem., April 1, 1998; 44(4): 705 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.