Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipshy, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipshy, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, W., Jr

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 3, Issue 3 290-294, Copyright © 1996 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Complications of mastectomy and their relationship to biopsy technique

K. A. Lipshy, J. P. Neifeld, R. M. Boyle, W. J. Frable, S. Ronan, P. Lotfi, H. D. Bear, J. S. Horsley 3rd and W. Lawrence Jr
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-0011, USA.

BACKGROUND: Wound complication rates after mastectomy are associated with several factors, but little information is available correlating biopsy technique with the development of postmastectomy wound complications. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is an accurate method to establish a diagnosis, but it is unknown whether this approach has an impact on complications after mastectomy. METHODS: Charts of 283 patients undergoing 289 mastectomies were reviewed to investigate any association between biopsy technique and postmastectomy complications. RESULTS: The diagnosis of breast cancer was made by FNA biopsy in 50%, open biopsy in 49.7%, and core needle biopsy in 0.3%. The overall wound infection rate was 5.3% (14 of 266), but only 1.6% when FNA biopsy was used compared with 6.9% with open biopsy (p = 0.06). Among 43 patients undergoing breast reconstruction concomitantly with mastectomy, the infection rate was 7.1% (0% after FNA, 12% after open biopsy). Neither the development of a postoperative seroma (9.8%) nor skin flap necrosis (5.6%) was influenced by the biopsy technique used. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that wound infections after mastectomy may be reduced when the diagnosis of breast cancer is established by FNA biopsy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. A. Olsen, S. Chu-Ongsakul, K. E. Brandt, J. R. Dietz, J. Mayfield, and V. J. Fraser
Hospital-Associated Costs Due to Surgical Site Infection After Breast Surgery
Arch Surg, January 1, 2008; 143(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. Witt, D. Yavuz, C. Walchetseder, H. Strohmer, and E. Kubista
Preoperative Core Needle Biopsy as an Independent Risk Factor for Wound Infection After Breast Surgery
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 745 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.