Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lise, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jessup, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lise, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jessup, J. M.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 4, Issue 2 176-183, Copyright © 1997 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

Association between sucrase-isomaltase and p53 expression in colorectal cancer

M. Lise, M. Loda, M. Fiorentino, A. M. Mercurio, I. C. Summerhayes, P. T. Lavin and J. M. Jessup
Department of Surgery, University of Padova, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Sucrase-isomaltase (SI) is a tissue-based phenotypic marker that is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). DF3 and galectin 3 are two other tissue-based markers that are upregulated during neoplastic transformation. Because p53 mutations are acquired during neoplastic progression, we reasoned that alterations in SI and p53 may be associated despite an apparent lack of biological interaction. METHODS: Paraffin sections from 183 patients who underwent surgery at New England Deaconess Hospital (NEDH) between 1965 and 1977 were analyzed first by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of the markers SI, DF3, and galectin 3, which were scored as absent or present. Paraffin sections from a second group of 59 patients who underwent surgery at NEDH between 1985 and 1992 were analyzed by IHC for the expression of p53 as well as SI, DF3, and galectin 3. p53 nuclear staining was scored as absent or present. Previous work has shown that p53 is mutated in all cells with nuclear staining and in 10% of tumors that are unstained. RESULTS: SI expression was not associated with the expression of either DF3 or galectin 3, and neither DF3 nor galectin 3 were prognostic factors in CRC. None of the phenotypic markers were associated with any of the clinicopathologic variables. However, 21 of 24 p53-positive cases (88%) expressed SI, whereas 15 of 35 p53-negative cases (43%) were also SI negative (p = 0.02, Fisher exact test). p53 expression was not associated with expression of DF3 or galectin 3. CONCLUSIONS: SI expression and p53 mutation are associated significantly in CRC. Although the mechanism underlying such an association in presently unknown, the association may define a subset of patients with a worse prognosis.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.