Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gadzala, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fuhrman, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gadzala, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fuhrman, G. M.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 4, Issue 4 283-286, Copyright © 1997 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Appropriate management of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotactic core needle breast biopsy

D. E. Gadzala, G. J. Cederbom, J. S. Bolton, W. M. McKinnon, G. H. Farr Jr, J. Champaign, K. Ordoyne, K. Chung and G. M. Fuhrman
Department of Surgery, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy (SCNBB) is a minimally invasive technique used to sample nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. The optimal management of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed by SCNBB is unknown. We hypothesized that ADH diagnosed by SCNBB should be evaluated by excisional breast biopsy (EBB) because of the risk of identifying carcinoma in association with ADH that would be missed if a diagnostic sampling technique alone was utilized. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, a prospective diagnostic protocol was created which called for SCNBB instead of EBB for patients with mammographic abnormalities considered suspicious for malignancy. If ADH was noted on histologic evaluation of the cores, patients were advised to undergo an EBB. RESULTS: A review of the initial 900 patients evaluated by SCNBB yielded 39 patients (4.3%) with ADH detected by SCNBB. Thirty-six of these 39 patients agreed to proceed with EBB: 19 patients demonstrated benign findings including atypical ductal hyperplasia, 13 patients demonstrated noninvasive ductal carcinoma, and 4 patients had evidence of invasive carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: A 47% rate of detecting noninvasive or invasive breast carcinoma supports the hypothesis that ADH detected by a sampling technique, such as SCNBB, should be managed by EBB.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Rizzo, M. J. Lund, G. Oprea, M. Schniederjan, W. C Wood, and M. Mosunjac
Surgical Follow-Up and Clinical Presentation of 142 Breast Papillary Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1040 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A. G Douglas-Jones, J. L Denson, A. C Cox, I. B Harries, and G. Stevens
Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 60(3): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. Jackman, R. L. Birdwell, and D. M. Ikeda
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Can Some Lesions Be Defined as Probably Benign after Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Biopsy, Eliminating the Recommendation for Surgical Excision?
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 548 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. Jackman, F. Burbank, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, M. C. Lechner, T. R. Richardson, A. A. Smid, H. B. Borofsky, C. H. Lee, H. M. Goldstein, et al.
Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 497 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. L. R. Darling, D. N. Smith, S. C. Lester, C. Kaelin, D.-L. G. Selland, C. M. Denison, P. J. DiPiro, D. I. Rose, E. Rhei, and J. E. Meyer
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1341 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. E. Reynolds
Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1245 - 1250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. J. Jackman, K. W. Nowels, J. Rodriguez-Soto, F. A. Marzoni Jr, S. I. Finkelstein, and M. J. Shepard
Stereotactic, Automated, Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: False-Negative and Histologic Underestimation Rates after Long-term Follow-up
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.