Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hempling, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Piver, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hempling, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Piver, M. S.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 4, Issue 4 349-354, Copyright © 1997 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

Second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a critical assessment of morbidity and impact on survival

R. E. Hempling, J. A. Wesolowski and M. S. Piver
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.

BACKGROUND: The routine inclusion of second-look laparotomy in the management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial. At issue is the justification of morbidity incumbent upon surgery and the possible survival benefit of secondary cytoreduction. METHODS: The rate of major complications of surgery was assessed among 100 consecutive patients with FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent second-look laparotomy. All patients demonstrated a complete clinical and biochemical (CA125 < 35 U/ml) response to first-line therapy. Patients were stratified based on findings at surgery. Patients in group 1 (n = 37) had a negative second-look laparotomy. Patients in group 2 (n = 35) had only microscopically appreciable disease. Patients in group 3 (n = 28) had macroscopic disease. Cytoreductive efforts aimed at resection of all macroscopic disease were carried out for patients in group 3. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (13%) had 15 major complications at surgery. Comparison of the complication rates for patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, of 10%, 8.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.228). The estimated 5-year survival for patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 of 63.9%, 39.8%, and 14.2%, did differ significantly (p < 0.0001). Cytoreductive efforts resulted in the resection of all macroscopic disease in 18 of 28 patients (64.2%) in group 3. The median survival for this group of 18 patients was 33 months, and estimated 5-year survival was 20%. These values do not differ significantly from those observed for patients in group 2. CONCLUSION: The major complication rate associated with second-look laparotomy is not prohibitive Secondary cytoreductive efforts may result in improved survival for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.