| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 5, Issue 2 131-139, Copyright © 1998 by Society of Surgical Oncology
ARTICLES |
V. Velanovich
Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689, USA.
BACKGROUND: The value of routine axillary dissection for patients with breast cancer is still being debated. The argument centers around whether the information gained by knowing the lymph node status, which aids in making the decision about adjuvant chemotherapy, justifies the morbidity. This study quantitatively analyzes the potential outcomes of routine, selective, and no axillary dissection. METHODS: A decision analysis was performed of the strategies of lumpectomy and radiation versus simple mastectomy followed by no dissection, selective dissection, or routine dissection. Factors included biologic markers to identify high-risk lesions, the morbidity of axillary dissection, the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive disease, and the life expectancy of patients with high-risk and low-risk node-negative and node-positive lesions. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine threshold levels of these factors in choosing an option. RESULTS: We discovered an advantage in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for no axillary dissection until the probability of positive lymph nodes reaches >15%; after that, selective node dissection is superior. Selective dissection is superior for lower morbidity rates of axillary dissection. Routine dissection is never a superior strategy. The difference among these strategies is small, however, with no one strategy providing a QALE greater than 1 year longer than any other. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary dissection can be avoided in patients with high-risk lesions who would be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of lymph node status, and possibly in patients with low-risk T1a lesions, but it should be recommended for low-risk T1b and T1c lesions for which lymph node status may determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Mandelblatt, C. Armetta, K. R. Yabroff, W. Liang, and W. Lawrence Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000 J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 8 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Chao, M.-F. Chen, C.-S. Wang, Y.-Y. Jan, T.-L. Hwang, and S.-C. Chen Small Invasive Breast Carcinomas in Taiwanese Women Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2003; 10(7): 740 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Mandelblatt, S. B. Edge, N. J. Meropol, R. Senie, T. Tsangaris, L. Grey, B. M. Peterson Jr, Y.-T. Hwang, J. Kerner, and J. Weeks Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Perceptions Versus Patterns of Care J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 21(5): 855 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Orr, J. L. Hoehn, and N. F. Col The Learning Curve for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Practical Considerations Arch Surg, July 1, 1999; 134(7): 764 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Parmigiani, D. A. Berry, E. P. Winer, C. Tebaldi, J. D. Iglehart, and L. R. Prosnitz Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Indicated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Decision Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1465 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |