Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velanovich, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velanovich, V.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 5, Issue 2 131-139, Copyright © 1998 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a decision analysis of T1 lesions

V. Velanovich
Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689, USA.

BACKGROUND: The value of routine axillary dissection for patients with breast cancer is still being debated. The argument centers around whether the information gained by knowing the lymph node status, which aids in making the decision about adjuvant chemotherapy, justifies the morbidity. This study quantitatively analyzes the potential outcomes of routine, selective, and no axillary dissection. METHODS: A decision analysis was performed of the strategies of lumpectomy and radiation versus simple mastectomy followed by no dissection, selective dissection, or routine dissection. Factors included biologic markers to identify high-risk lesions, the morbidity of axillary dissection, the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive disease, and the life expectancy of patients with high-risk and low-risk node-negative and node-positive lesions. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine threshold levels of these factors in choosing an option. RESULTS: We discovered an advantage in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for no axillary dissection until the probability of positive lymph nodes reaches >15%; after that, selective node dissection is superior. Selective dissection is superior for lower morbidity rates of axillary dissection. Routine dissection is never a superior strategy. The difference among these strategies is small, however, with no one strategy providing a QALE greater than 1 year longer than any other. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary dissection can be avoided in patients with high-risk lesions who would be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of lymph node status, and possibly in patients with low-risk T1a lesions, but it should be recommended for low-risk T1b and T1c lesions for which lymph node status may determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Mandelblatt, C. Armetta, K. R. Yabroff, W. Liang, and W. Lawrence
Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 8 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T.-C. Chao, M.-F. Chen, C.-S. Wang, Y.-Y. Jan, T.-L. Hwang, and S.-C. Chen
Small Invasive Breast Carcinomas in Taiwanese Women
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2003; 10(7): 740 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, S. B. Edge, N. J. Meropol, R. Senie, T. Tsangaris, L. Grey, B. M. Peterson Jr, Y.-T. Hwang, J. Kerner, and J. Weeks
Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Perceptions Versus Patterns of Care
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 21(5): 855 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. K. Orr, J. L. Hoehn, and N. F. Col
The Learning Curve for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Practical Considerations
Arch Surg, July 1, 1999; 134(7): 764 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Parmigiani, D. A. Berry, E. P. Winer, C. Tebaldi, J. D. Iglehart, and L. R. Prosnitz
Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Indicated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Decision Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1465 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.