Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sosa, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeiger, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sosa, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeiger, M. A.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 5, Issue 2 140-149, Copyright © 1998 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Association between extent of axillary lymph node dissection and survival in patients with stage I breast cancer

J. A. Sosa, M. Diener-West, Y. Gusev, M. A. Choti, J. R. Lange, W. C. Dooley and M. A. Zeiger
Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

BACKGROUND: The role of axillary lymph node dissection for stage I (T1N0) breast cancer remains controversial because patients can receive adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of their nodal status and because its therapeutic benefit is in question. The purpose of this study was to determine whether extent of axillary dissection in patients with T1N0 disease is associated with survival. METHODS: Data from 464 patients with T1N0 breast cancer who underwent axillary dissection from 1973 to 1994 were examined retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence were calculated for patients according to the number of lymph nodes removed (<10 or > or = 10; <15 or > or = 15), and survival curves compared using the Wilcoxon-Gehan statistic. Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was used to adjust for confounding prognostic variables. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 6.4 years. Patient groups were similar in age, menopausal status, tumor size, hormonal receptor status, type of surgery, and adjuvant therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival in the > or = 10 versus <10 nodal groups (P <.01). Five-year estimates of survival were 75.7% and 86.2% for <10 nodes and > or = 10 nodes, respectively; 10-year estimates were 66.1% and 74.3%. There also was a notable improvement in the survival comparison of patients with <15 versus > or = 15 nodes (P < or = .05). These findings were confirmed in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results may reflect a potential for misclassification of tumor stage among patients who had fewer nodes removed. The data, however, suggest that in patients with Stage I breast cancer, improved survival is associated with a more complete axillary lymph node dissection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. K. Chan, E. G. Munro, M. K. Cheung, A. Husain, N. N. Teng, J. S. Berek, and K. Osann
Association of Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Stage I Ovarian Cancer Patients
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 12 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I Blancas, J. Garcia-Puche, B Bermejo, E. Hanrahan, C Monteagudo, A Martinez-Agullo, R Rouzier, B. Hennessy, V Valero, and A Lluch
Low number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative breast cancer patients is an adverse prognostic factor
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1644 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Fleischmann, G. N. Thalmann, R. Markwalder, and U. E. Studer
Extracapsular Extension of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases From Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Is an Independent Prognostic Factor
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2358 - 2365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J E A Somner, J M J Dixon, and J S J Thomas
Node retrieval in axillary lymph node dissections: recommendations for minimum numbers to be confident about node negative status
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2004; 57(8): 845 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Nieto, S. Nawaz, E. J. Shpall, S. I. Bearman, J. Murphy, and R. B. Jones
Long-Term Analysis and Prospective Validation of a Prognostic Model for Patients with High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2609 - 2617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. J. Van Zee, D.-M. E. Manasseh, J. L. B. Bevilacqua, S. K. Boolbol, J. V. Fey, L. K. Tan, P. I. Borgen, H. S. Cody III, and M. W. Kattan
A Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Additional Nodal Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients With a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2003; 10(10): 1140 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. N. Krag and R. M. Single
Breast Cancer Survival According to Number of Nodes Removed
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2003; 10(10): 1152 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
F.C. Wright, J. Walker, C.H.L. Law, and D.R. McCready
Outcomes After Localized Axillary Node Recurrence in Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 10(9): 1054 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T.-C. Chao, M.-F. Chen, C.-S. Wang, Y.-Y. Jan, T.-L. Hwang, and S.-C. Chen
Small Invasive Breast Carcinomas in Taiwanese Women
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2003; 10(7): 740 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Weir, C. Speers, Y. D'yachkova, and I. A. Olivotto
Prognostic Significance of the Number of Axillary Lymph Nodes Removed in Patients With Node-Negative Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1793 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
S Frkovic-Grazio and M Bracko
Long term prognostic value of Nottingham histological grade and its components in early (pT1N0M0) breast carcinoma
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 55(2): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. L. Wong, M. J. Edwards, C. Chao, T. M. Tuttle, R. D. Noyes, C. Woo, P. B. Cerrito, K. M. McMasters, and for the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sen
Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Axillary Nodes: A Multicenter Study
Arch Surg, May 1, 2001; 136(5): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. K. Orr, J. L. Hoehn, and N. F. Col
The Learning Curve for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Practical Considerations
Arch Surg, July 1, 1999; 134(7): 764 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. M. McMasters, A. E. Giuliano, M. I. Ross, D. S. Reintgen, K. K. Hunt, D. R. Byrd, V. S. Klimberg, P. W. Whitworth, L. C. Tafra, and M. J. Edwards
Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer -- Not Yet the Standard of Care
N. Engl. J. Med., October 1, 1998; 339(14): 990 - 995.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.