Annals of Surgical Oncology Cite Track
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nemoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nemoto, T.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 5, Issue 5 452-455, Copyright © 1998 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

Ductal carcinoma in situ-associated nipple discharge: a clinical marker for locally extensive disease

R. L. Bauer, K. H. Eckhert Jr and T. Nemoto
Department of Surgery, Sisters of Charity Hospital, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the diagnosis and treatment of women with pathologic nipple discharge caused by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Women with unilateral spontaneous bloody, serous, or brown nipple discharge who presented between January 1, 1988 and August 1, 1996 were identified by retrospective chart review. Women with nonspontaneous, physiologic discharge were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven women with a mean age of 59.5 years (range, 24 to 88 years) underwent duct exploration and biopsy for pathologic discharge, with 43 (15.5%) found to have DCIS. The discharge was bloody in 29, clear in eight, and brown in six women. Seven of 12 (58%) women with an associated breast mass were found to have a microinvasive component with the DCIS. Discharge cytology showed malignant cells in only two of 12 (16%) women examined. A ductogram was performed on 20 women, with filling defects seen in 10, ectasia in 3, narrowing in 4, and normal ducts in 3. The DCIS included 17 (40%) specimens with cribriform pattern, 17 (40%) micropapillary, 8 (18%) comedo, and 2 (2%) solid. Twelve microinvasive cancers were found in combination with DCIS. After duct exploration, 37 (86%) patients were found to have extensive or multifocal DCIS to the margin, or both, with 32 (74%) patients requiring mastectomy to achieve free surgical margins. There was residual disease in 27 of 32 (84%) mastectomy specimens after initial biopsy. Breast conservation was possible in only 11 (26%) women. Forty of 43 (93%) are disease-free with a median follow-up of 37 months. CONCLUSION: Women presenting with pathologic nipple discharge require duct exploration regardless of cytologic or radiologic findings. When discharge is the result of DCIS, extensiveness of disease in relation to central location and intraductal spread may preclude breast conservation in as many as 27 of 43 (63%) cases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
W. C. Dooley
Routine Operative Breast Endoscopy for Bloody Nipple Discharge
Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2002; 9(9): 920 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.