Annals of Surgical Oncology Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morton, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelemen, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morton, D. L.

Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 6, Issue 2 139-143, Copyright © 1999 by Society of Surgical Oncology


ARTICLES

Lymph node biopsy does not impair survival after therapeutic dissection for palpable melanoma metastases

P. R. Kelemen, L. A. Wanek and D. L. Morton
John Wayne Cancer Institute, Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California 90404, USA.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of disrupting a nodal basin in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma with clinically palpable lymph nodes, we studied patients who underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection after excisional lymph node biopsy, after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, or without a preoperative biopsy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma who were treated between January 1972 and June 1995, using data acquired from our 8200-patient database. The study group included 670 patients with melanoma, with known primary tumors, who underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection for palpable nodal metastases diagnosed by open biopsy (227 patients), by FNA (66 patients), or by clinical observation without biopsy (377 patients). Regional node recurrence, 5-year disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated. RESULTS: The same-basin regional node recurrence rates were similar for the three groups (open biopsy, 4.6%; FNA, 3.2%; no biopsy, 4.6%; P = .14). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 36.8% for the open-biopsy group, 29.6% for the FNA group, and 28.9% for the no-biopsy group (P = .08); corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 40.6%, 43.9%, and 36.1%, respectively (P = .18). Multivariate analysis failed to identify preoperative biopsy as a significant risk factor. Matched-pair analysis using age, gender, primary tumor site, Breslow thickness, and tumor burden showed no differences in the 5-year disease-free survival rates (33% for the open-biopsy group vs. 27% for the FNA and no-biopsy groups, P = .42) and the 5-year overall survival rates (41% vs. 35%, P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with melanoma with palpable regional adenopathy, histological confirmation of clinical suspicion with either FNA or excisional lymph node biopsy does not adversely affect survival or recurrence rates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
N. Nathansohn, J. Schachter, and H. Gutman
Patterns of Recurrence in Patients With Melanoma After Radical Lymph Node Dissection
Arch Surg, December 1, 2005; 140(12): 1172 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Surgical Oncology.