Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol 6, Issue 6 609-613, Copyright © 1999 by Society of Surgical Oncology

ARTICLES

The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy

C. Laronga, B. Kemp, D. Johnston, G. L. Robb and S. E. Singletary
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of breast cancer traditionally has included resection of the nipple-areola complex (NAC), in the belief that this area had a significant probability of containing occult tumors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the true incidence of NAC involvement in patients who underwent a skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and to determine associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 326 patients who had a SSM at our institution from 1990 to 1993. NAC involvement was reviewed in 286 mastectomy specimens. The charts were analyzed for tumor size, site, histology, grade, nodal status, recurrence, survival, and NAC involvement. RESULTS: Occult tumor involvement in the NAC was found in 5.6% of mastectomy specimens (16 patients). Four patients would have had NAC involvement identified on frozen section if they had been undergoing a skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the NAC. There were no significant differences between NAC-positive (NAC+) and NAC-negative (NAC-) patients in median tumor size, nuclear grade, histologic subtype of the primary tumor, or receptor status. There were significant differences in location of the primary tumor (subareolar or multicentric vs. peripheral) and positive axillary lymph node status. NAC involvement was not a marker for increased recurrence or decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: Occult NAC involvement occurred in only a small percentage of patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomies. NAC preservation would be appropriate in axillary node-negative patients with small, solitary tumors located on the periphery of the breast.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Stolier and J. Wang Terminal Duct Lobular Units are Scarce in the Nipple: Implications for Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Terminal Duct Lobular Units in the Nipple Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 438 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Torresan, C. C. dos Santos, H. Okamura, and M. Alvarenga Evaluation of Residual Glandular Tissue After Skin-Sparing Mastectomies Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Crowe Jr, J. A. Kim, R. Yetman, J. Banbury, R. J. Patrick, and D. Baynes Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Technique and Results of 54 Procedures Arch Surg, February 1, 2004; 139(2): 148 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Ho, C. K. L. Mak, Y. Lau, W. Y. Cheung, M. C. M. Chan, and W. K. Hung Skin Involvement in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Safety of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 102 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Simmons, M. Brennan, P. Christos, V. King, and M. Osborne Analysis of Nipple/Areolar Involvement With Mastectomy: Can the Areola Be Preserved? Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2002; 9(2): 165 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]